Tremulous Forum
Mods => Mod Releases => Non-Gameplay Changing => Topic started by: The_Beast on August 30, 2007, 08:31:53 pm
-
Hello everyone,
I released a tremulous server version, based on the revision 971 (the latest at the date of this post, which implies many bug fixes) of the SVN with some patches applied (like retro-compatibility with tremulous client 1.1.0, improvements in some systems like donating, ...).
You can find it at http://www.polytech.unice.fr/~boscq/divers/tremulous/ everything is explained.
Also, a configuration set is available (server.cfg and admin.dat) and a shell script if you want to compile it by yourself or add other patches.
Enjoy, I'd be pleased to have feedbacks.
-
my blacktogrey.patch only works on clients, it is thoroughly redundant in this context.
Otherwise, reasonably nice work. Not sure you can compete with Lakitu's feature-rich VM though.
-
Thank you for your reply and your patches. I don't want to make a server full of features. My goal is to provide one that can satisfy people who want a simple server, but up to date and with some cool things :)
Ha, it's based on the 972 revision now.
-
Updated to the SVN 1019 revision (latest rev. when I'm writing this post).
I've also added the client (same revision) and the windows versions.
-
Updated to the SVN 1019 revision (latest rev. when I'm writing this post).
I've also added the client (same revision) and the windows versions.
it works?
did you test it?
-
Yes it does, this server is running it : -]BTW[-Serveur 91.121.3.180:30720 down
81.57.162.83:30720
-
NO
-
my blacktogrey.patch only works on clients, it is thoroughly redundant in this context.
Newsflash .-)
p.black_names_fix.patch
That is not your patch, that's the server-side patch from Napkin and Peoro.
Your "blacktogrey.patch" is not even mentioned :)
-
Newsflash .-)
That is not your patch, that's the server-side patch from Napkin and Peoro.
Your "blacktogrey.patch" is not even mentioned :)
Check post dates, what I said was accurate when I said it.
-
Roflol, Mea culpa.
You are right. I only looked on the day of the posts, not the month :)