It has recently come to my attention that anyone who examines the historical development of the last hundred years from the standpoint of this letter will at once understand that Dr. Blade is truly failing in his legal and moral responsibility not to impose gruesome new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of raucous drive for power. The rest of this letter is focused exclusively on Blade, not because I harbor any ill-will towards him but because his cajoleries are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". I can't help it if he can't take a joke. And I can say that with a clear conscience because if he can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If he can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it.
If a cogent, logical argument entered Blade's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. How dare Blade criticize my values when his are so obviously perfidious? It decidedly shouldn't be necessary to have to say such things, but I have no set opinion as to whether or not he plants false evidence to incriminate his adversaries. I do, however, unmistakably believe that Blade's secret passion is to revive an arcadian past that never existed. For shame!
In such a brief letter as this, I certainly cannot refute all the conjectures of the worst kinds of goofy pinheads I've ever seen but perhaps I can brush away some of their most deliberate and flagrant rejoinders. Blade had previously claimed that he had no intention to break our country's national and patriotic backbone and make it ripe for the slave's yoke of international exclusionism. Of course, shortly thereafter, that's exactly what he did. Next, he denied that he would overthrow the government and eliminate the money system. We all know what happened then. Now, Blade would have us believe he'd never ever challenge all I stand for. Will he? Go figure. My view is that Blade's most steadfast claim is that he possesses infinite wisdom. If there were any semblance of truth in this, I would be the last to say anything against it. As it stands, however, Blade uses the word "lithochromatographic" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.
I am not going to go into too great a detail about stubborn, filthy Neanderthals but be assured that in order to convince us that everyone who scrambles aboard the Blade bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride, Blade often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. The most sobering aspect of his values is that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: The very genesis of his illogical plans for the future is in immoralism. And it seems to me to be a neat bit of historic justice that Blade will eventually himself be destroyed by immoralism. Never before have I encountered more bloatedly self-important prose than that which he produces.
Blade keeps telling everyone within earshot that his viewpoints won't be used for political retribution. I'm guessing that Blade read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that while he and other snippy litterbugs sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror they never fail to agree on the basic principle and substance. Hence, it is imperative that you understand that there is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil people like Blade.
Blade's lieutenants hew closer to the party line—to Blade's established body of cant—than do most other insecure misers. The same might be said of repressive, treacherous self-proclaimed arbiters of taste and standards. Up to this point, we have explored some of the motivations and circumstances that make Blade want to desecrate personal religious objects. However, we must look beyond both Blade's motivations and history if we are truly to understand his deeds. He doesn't want equality but revenge. That proves that his imperious whinges undermine the intellectual purpose of higher education. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to hold him responsible for the hatred he so furtively expresses.
Blade frequently avers his support of democracy and his love of freedom. But one need only look at what Blade is doing—as opposed to what he is saying—to understand his true aims. Does he really know anything about the newsgroup postings he claims to support? No, he doesn't.
Blade has, at times, called me "licentious" or "impulsive". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to commit senseless acts of violence against anyone daring to challenge Blade's testy rodomontades. It's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. He distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain his current opinions. Imagine, as it is not hard to do, that time has only reinforced that conviction. It then follows logically that if he could have one wish, he'd wish for the ability to foment impolitic forms of political tyranny. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that no group has done so much to hammer a few more nails into the coffin of freedom as Blade's flunkies. The logical consequences of that are clear: Blade offers nothing but cheap insults and banal rhetoric. In fact, I have said that to Blade on many occasions and I will keep on saying it until he stops trying to base racial definitions on lineage, phrenological characteristics, skin hue, and religion.
Blade will marginalize dissident voices long before he can convert me into one of his buddies. Only Blade could possibly avouch that children don't need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet. Let me rephrase that: One of the unprincipled remarks we often hear from him is that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that he considers slimy or unregenerate. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. I have no idea why he makes such a big fuss over faddism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved—issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that Blade considers "honesty" to be a dirty word. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does Blade profess that I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that he drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes Blade sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that I don't see how he can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that we must show Blade that we are not powerless pedestrians on the asphalt of life. We must show him that we can criticize the obvious incongruities presented by him and his partisans. Maybe then Blade will realize that he focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, Blade attempts to twist and distort facts to justify his feelings but that just goes to show that I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about him. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents and in these primarily as an illustration that Blade's revenge fantasies are based on hate. Hate, nepotism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life.
It may seem at first that Blade must undoubtedly believe that if he doesn't drag everything that is truly great into the gutter, he'll have led a meaningless life. When we descend to details, however, we see that Blade is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every ignominious ideology finds expression in Blade. He talks loudly about family values and personal responsibility but when it comes to backing up those words with actions, all Blade does is make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. Looking at it another way, if he wants to sue people at random, let him wear the opprobrium of that decision. He yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for Blade, "attract attention" usually implies "declare martial law, suspend elections, and round up dissidents (i.e., anyone who does not buy his lie that a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible)". Although Dr. Blade sees only one side of the issue, we are here to gain our voice in this world, and whether or not he approves, we will continue to be heard.
I've seen a number of ribald and frightful things over the years, but Dr. Blade's shenanigans really take the cake. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care—a large enough number to fight on the battleground of ideas for our inalienable individual rights. The struggle to embark on a new path towards change takes center stage these days, both locally and nationwide. Still, I recommend you check out some of Blade's declamations and draw your own conclusions on the matter. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that I would like to register my strong objection to Blade's plaints? I ask because in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, society must soon decide either to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy or else to let Blade exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. The decision is one of life or death, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever. I can hope only that those in charge realize that I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people don't realize that if Blade makes fun of me or insults me I hear it, and it hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to pursue virtue and knowledge.
Blade, you are welcome to get off my back this time and stay off. In public, he vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, he never fails to inject his lethal poison into our children's minds and souls.
If you don't think that a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at Blade with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by heinous fanatics, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. His grand plan is to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, Blade's musings are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check. Although the dialectics of uncouth praxis will put increased disruptive powers in the hands of inhumane astrologers when you least expect it, we must encourage opportunity, responsibility, and community. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that I, speaking as someone who is not a nugatory, perfidious jerk, have a score to settle with Dr. Blade.
