Alright, the first one is the direct area in the condump in which this incident took place,
SirSkilSabiTheBasilisk was sniped by TEAMMATE Devil's # 666's Dragoon
[A] SirSkilSabiTheBasilisk: wtf
palaran was machinegunned by =Pk:|Wiki-
[A] SirSkilSabiTheBasilisk: dear god
[A] Devil's # 666: whoa sry man
coco was bitten by Soul Tracker1080
Devil's # 666 was mauled by TEAMMATE SirSkilSabiTheBasilisk's Tyrant
Snicky-Dawg was sniped by higashinipponnokyodaijishin's Dragoon
Soul Tracker1080 was machinegunned by Fodder
I'll post the second one in another post, it seems to be too long.
Objection your Honor,
I would like to take this opportunity to jump to my clients defense. Based on these con-dumps provided, there is no concrete evidence to suggest this team-kill was intentional. The only thing obvious is that a team-kill was made, the motives behind it however cannot be determined by mere text. So i suggest that this evidence alone is inadequate to prosecute my client.
For all the jury knows, my client was team-killed and then in the sole interest of defending the base quickly rushed back into the skirmish where 'Devils # 666' just happened to be and based on his
obvious clumsy nature, evident by a snipe team-kill:
"SirSkilSabiTheBasilisk was sniped by TEAMMATE Devil's # 666's Dragoon"
He got in the way of my clients tyrant claw and was accidentally team-killed.
I call for the charges to be dropped based on insufficient evidence against my client.
No further comments your Honor.