OpenGL(Yes Hardware Stuff)

[Seronx]

Code: [Select]


Mainboard : Intel D915GAG
Chipset : Intel i915G
Processor : Intel Pentium 4 530 @ 3000 MHz
Physical Memory : 2048 MB (2 x 1024 DDR-SDRAM )
Video Card : Nvidia Corp NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS
Hard Disk : ST3200822AS (200 GB)
DVD-Rom Drive : _NEC DVD_RW ND-3500AG ATA Device
CD-Rom Drive : HL-DT-ST CD-ROM GCR-8483B ATA Device
Monitor Type : Samsung SyncMaster - 22 inches
Network Card : Intel Corporation 82562EZ PRO/100 Ethernet Controller
Operating System : Windows Vista (TM) Home Premium Home Edition 6.00.6000
DirectX : Version 10.00
Windows Performance Index : 4.2


My Hardware Stats

I'm having the same opengl problems >_> it runs fine on 800x600 but anything beyond it just dies

Code: [Select]


tremulous 1.1.0 win_mingw-x86 Feb 28 2006
----- FS_Startup -----
Current search path:
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\vms-1.1.0.pk3 (4 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\map-uncreation-1.1.0.pk3 (110 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\map-tremor-1.1.0.pk3 (45 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\map-transit-1.1.0.pk3 (135 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\map-niveus-1.1.0.pk3 (134 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\map-nexus6-1.1.0.pk3 (151 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\map-karith-1.1.0.pk3 (118 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\map-atcs-1.1.0.pk3 (87 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\map-arachnid2-1.1.0.pk3 (67 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous\base\data-1.1.0.pk3 (1229 files)
C:\Program Files\Tremulous/base

----------------------
2080 files in pk3 files
execing default.cfg
execing autogen.cfg
couldn't exec autoexec.cfg
Hunk_Clear: reset the hunk ok
...detecting CPU, found generic

------- Input Initialization -------
No window for DirectInput mouse init, delaying
Joystick is not active.
------------------------------------
----- Client Initialization -----
----- Initializing Renderer ----
-------------------------------
----- Client Initialization Complete -----
----- R_Init -----
Initializing OpenGL subsystem
...initializing QGL
...calling LoadLibrary( 'C:\Windows\system32\opengl32.dll' ): succeeded
...setting mode 9: 1600 1200 FS
...using colorsbits of 32
...calling CDS: failed, bad mode
...trying next higher resolution: failed, bad mode
...restoring display settings
...registered window class
...created window@3,22 (1606x1226)
Initializing OpenGL driver
...getting DC: succeeded
...GLW_ChoosePFD( 32, 24, 8 )
...113 PFDs found
...hardware acceleration found
...PIXELFORMAT 9 selected
...creating GL context: succeeded
...making context current: succeeded
...WARNING: fullscreen unavailable in this mode
...setting mode 9: 1600 1200 FS
...using colorsbits of 16
...calling CDS: failed, bad mode
...trying next higher resolution: failed, bad mode
...restoring display settings
...window already present, CreateWindowEx skipped
Initializing OpenGL driver
...WARNING: fullscreen unavailable in this mode
...shutting down QGL
...unloading OpenGL DLL
...assuming '3dfxvgl' is a standalone driver
...initializing QGL
...WARNING: missing Glide installation, assuming no 3Dfx available
...shutting down QGL
----- CL_Shutdown -----
RE_Shutdown( 1 )
-----------------------
GLW_StartOpenGL() - could not load OpenGL subsystem

Code: [Select]


General Information :
Manufacturer : NVIDIA Corporation
Version : 2.1.1
Renderer : GeForce 8800 GTS/PCI/SSE2
Acceleration : Yes, Hardware

 Extensions :
GL_ARB_color_buffer_float : Yes
GL_ARB_depth_texture : Yes
GL_ARB_draw_buffers : Yes
GL_ARB_fragment_program : Yes
GL_ARB_fragment_program_sha... Yes
GL_ARB_fragment_shader : Yes
GL_ARB_half_float_pixel : Yes
GL_ARB_imaging : Yes
GL_ARB_multisample : Yes
GL_ARB_multitexture : Yes
GL_ARB_occlusion_query : Yes
GL_ARB_pixel_buffer_object : Yes
GL_ARB_point_parameters : Yes
GL_ARB_point_sprite : Yes
GL_ARB_shadow : Yes
GL_ARB_shader_objects : Yes
GL_ARB_shading_language_100 : Yes
GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp : Yes
GL_ARB_texture_compression : Yes
GL_ARB_texture_cube_map : Yes
GL_ARB_texture_env_add : Yes
GL_ARB_texture_env_combine : Yes
GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 : Yes
GL_ARB_texture_float : Yes
GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat : Yes
GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_... Yes
GL_ARB_texture_rectangle : Yes
GL_ARB_transpose_matrix : Yes
GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object : Yes
GL_ARB_vertex_program : Yes

Yes I haveOpenGL >_>

[Odin]

sudo apt-get install 915resolution

[kevlarman]

Code: [Select]

...WARNING: fullscreen unavailable in this mode
...shutting down QGL
play in windowed mode or wait for proper opengl from nvidia (or don't use vista)

[tehOen]

get a real os like XP. even ubuntu is better than vista

[next_ghost]

sudo apt-get install 915resolution

That won't work on WVista.

Seronx, make sure you have vendor graphics drivers, not crappy default drivers from Microsoft. Then if you have vendor drivers and it doesn't work, find your autogen.cfg and try changing r_mode cvar. r_mode table looks like this:
r_mode 3: 640x480
r_mode 4: 800x600
r_mode 5: 960x720
r_mode 6: 1024x768
r_mode 7: 1152x864
r_mode 8: 1280x1024
r_mode 9: 1600x1200

[Somethief]

get a real os like XP. even ubuntu is better than vista

You call XP a real os?!
Dude, get linux (And ubuntu is such newbdist, there are better ones around)
And vista is the worst thing ever, 98 > vista

[Seronx]

Vista PWNS All

I use eVGA vendor drivers ^^


Also uhh there no autogen what ever in my tremulous folder


Screw XP and anything before it
Vista pwns everything else sucks
(Vista currently has no viruses for it only spyware lol)

[AKAnotu]

(Vista currently has no viruses for it only spyware lol)

because nobody cares enough to use it so the makers don't get satisfaction of screwing up peoples computers

[tehOen]

get a real os like XP. even ubuntu is better than vista

You call XP a real os?!
Dude, get linux (And ubuntu is such newbdist, there are better ones around)
And vista is the worst thing ever, 98 > vista

linux is not an os designed for average human needs
it feels like something you setup and it runs by itself
imho macosx is the best OS it is quite user friendly.
then XP comes. it is also user friendly but it has lots of security holes and bugs.
and linux great stability, nearly no security holes but user interface sucks and it has lots of gui applications that does the same job. one is missing feature X the other is missing feature Y. it looks like all free source software stacked on top of each other. I can call linux a real OS, just a great server OS. I am a freaking newbie client!

[TinMan]

You can all stfu, Plan 9 ftw.

[Seronx]

I'm sticking for Vista now becuase it is the best for now I have yet to get any errors except game snot designed for windows vista but that can be instantly fixed sometimes by checking Windows XP Compatibility mode >_>

[Somethief]

Linux user interface is way above all the windozes, virtual desktops by default, you actually can tune kinda anything you want. After trying out a linux you wont be back to windoze.
Also linux is alot faster than any of the windoze systems (Well booting takes abit longer but after it its faster), linux also gives professional users alot better workaround than any of the windozeses ever, <3 bash
And on windoze you need to download applications for every file you want open, it wont even open a .rar without help of third party as linux has opened every file i have met this far (Also runs windoze .exes and plays all the videos including M$ formats).
Theres nothing what is better on windoze systems. (And all "new" features of vista are copied from linux and OS X. kthxbye)

[tehOen]

as you said it gives power to professional users
not the poor newbies
linux gui doesnt look good even if you can costomize every little piece. it still wont look good. it is not designed by professionals. macosx beats windows and linux and windows beats linux in gui design. linux is trying to immidate windows and macosx look and feel. windows is trying to immitate macosx

[Somethief]

Linux systems are very easy to use, even easier than windoze systems. People just imagine that it's hard and they can judge it without testing it.
I haven't owned a mac for a single day so i cant say if it's better than my linux but i can say that linux pwns windoze easily as i have used it from 3.1 to vista

[next_ghost]

Here's a nice comparison how much user friendly Windows really are: Switching from KDE to WinXP.

[Somethief]

Here's a nice comparison how much user friendly Windows really are: Switching from KDE to WinXP.

+1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5uEe5OzNQ&mode=related&search=mo

[tehOen]

Here's a nice comparison how much user friendly Windows really are: Switching from KDE to WinXP.

+1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC5uEe5OzNQ&mode=related&search=mo

it is a guy switching from KDE to XP
switching gui is always pita, so it is not objective
EXAMPLE IS INVALID

[next_ghost]

it is a guy switching from KDE to XP
switching gui is always pita, so it is not objective
EXAMPLE IS INVALID

Read the article. It's valid because the points ARE objective. The first part covers what one desktop has that the writers misses in the other. The second part compares common features in terms of usability, layout logic and possible customization.

One of the points: Localization of WinXP is one-way process while switching among any two localizations of KDE takes 4 clicks and you can do it anytime you want.

[tehOen]

it is a guy switching from KDE to XP
switching gui is always pita, so it is not objective
EXAMPLE IS INVALID

Read the article. It's valid because the points ARE objective. The first part covers what one desktop has that the writers misses in the other. The second part compares common features in terms of usability, layout logic and possible customization.

One of the points: Localization of WinXP is one-way process while switching among any two localizations of KDE takes 4 clicks and you can do it anytime you want.

I read extremely biased and for localization I dont change my native
language every single day

definitely change of OS syndrome nothing else

For the last several months I have been using Microsoft Windows XP (WinXP) at work after years of using Linux almost exclusively at home and work. In late December 2005 the computers in my section were replaced with new ones that run WinXP and unfortunately this time installing Linux was not an option.

[Somethief]

@tehOen: You have ever used a linux based system?  :roll:

[next_ghost]

I think we should stop feeding the troll.

*adds teh0en to ignore list after reading all of his posts*

[kevlarman]

@tehOen: You have ever used a linux based system?  :roll:

I think we should stop feeding the troll.

*adds teh0en to ignore list after reading all of his posts*

you two really need to learn to recognize f0rqu3 better.

[Somethief]

you two really need to learn to recognize f0rqu3 better.

I know that its f0rqu3..

[Seronx]

When did this become a fight to the death?

This is final Vista is the best... stop talking about other things I needs helpz here >_>

>>

[kevlarman]

When did this become a fight to the death?

This is final Vista is the best... stop talking about other things I needs helpz here >_>

>>

Code: [Select]


...WARNING: fullscreen unavailable in this mode
...shutting down QGL

play in windowed mode or wait for proper opengl from nvidia (or don't use vista)

[Somethief]

Vista is the best? You cant even play trem on it, plzzzzz!  :roll:

[Seronx]

Well i fixed it without any of your help its tremulus problem has no support for widescreen :X

And after 10 mins I uninstalled I'm stick with CS:S >_>

[kevlarman]

Well i fixed it without any of your help its tremulus problem has no support for widescreen :X

And after 10 mins I uninstalled I'm stick with CS:S >_>

tremulous supports widescreen just fine, just like every other q3 based game.

[next_ghost]

Well i fixed it without any of your help its tremulus problem has no support for widescreen :X

And after 10 mins I uninstalled I'm stick with CS:S >_>

1600x1200 isn't widescreen, it's yet another 4:3 resolution. And I can play Tremulous in this resolution without any problem. Once again, WVista drivers suck. Especially if they come from M$.