Poll

Which is better then a 3.2ghz with HT for Tremulous?

AMD Opteron 170 2 x 2.0ghz (2x 1 mb cache)
3 (42.9%)
None. The 3.2ghz with HT is best.
4 (57.1%)

Total Members Voted: 6

Voting closed: July 30, 2006, 01:24:38 am

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Question for Servers  (Read 5283 times)

Confess

  • Posts: 237
  • Turrets: +25/-15
    • http://sstcentral.com
Question for Servers
« on: July 29, 2006, 11:19:51 pm »
Im trying to find out which would be better for a Tremulous server, specificly the |SST| Tremulous server.

Which of these would be (if they are) better then a 3.2ghz with HT.
Intel Pentium D 930 ~ 2 x 3.2ghz (2x 2mb cache)
or an AMD Opteron 170 2 x 2.0ghz (2x 1 mb cache)
The OS would be Windows.
Logged
know that I myself cannot do anything, that I will fall, and that I am a sinful man, but I know that I can do ANYTHING through God Almighty, whom strengthens me.

PIE

  • Posts: 1471
  • Turrets: +96/-52
    • http://www.mercenariesguild.net
Question for Servers
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2006, 11:26:47 pm »
... the pentium with the 2mb cache.
This might have been a good topic for a poll.. I just have had good experiences with pentiums and that cache is a great help.
Logged

rasz_pl

  • Guest
Question for Servers
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2006, 11:41:05 pm »
http://www.3dnews.ru/documents/12137/quake3.gif

ZERO performance boost from the second core

Why would you want to buy opteron for this beats me. And WHY would you like to upgrade CPU for ONE Q3 server beats me again.
Logged

rasz_pl

  • Guest
Question for Servers
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2006, 11:42:33 pm »
Quote from: "PIE"
... the pentium with the 2mb cache.
This might have been a good topic for a poll.. I just have had good experiences with pentiums and that cache is a great help.


no, that cache is a MUST with P4 NetBurst fiasco architecture.
Logged

Confess

  • Posts: 237
  • Turrets: +25/-15
    • http://sstcentral.com
Question for Servers
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2006, 12:45:09 am »
The servers are all the same price. Upgrading would essentially not cost anything.
Logged
know that I myself cannot do anything, that I will fall, and that I am a sinful man, but I know that I can do ANYTHING through God Almighty, whom strengthens me.

rasz_pl

  • Guest
Question for Servers
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2006, 01:15:33 am »
in that case I would opt for .. Linux option :]
the speed will be comparable no matter what you choose, I would AMD :)
Logged

kevlarman

  • Posts: 2737
  • Turrets: +291/-295
Question for Servers
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2006, 01:16:18 am »
Quote from: "rasz_pl"
http://www.3dnews.ru/documents/12137/quake3.gif

ZERO performance boost from the second core

Why would you want to buy opteron for this beats me. And WHY would you like to upgrade CPU for ONE Q3 server beats me again.
yes, because the fps is a good measurement of server performance </sarcasm>. depending on how it is written, the server could get a huge increase in performance from having a second core, or it could get virtually no benefit, but the client is completely unrelated which of those will happen
Logged
Quote from: Asvarox link=topic=8622.msg169333#msg169333
Ok let's plan it out. Asva, you are nub, go sit on rets, I will build, you two go feed like hell, you go pwn their asses, and everyone else camp in the hallway, roger?
the dretch bites.
-----
|..d| #
|.@.-##
-----

Confess

  • Posts: 237
  • Turrets: +25/-15
    • http://sstcentral.com
Question for Servers
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2006, 01:25:01 am »
poll added.
Logged
know that I myself cannot do anything, that I will fall, and that I am a sinful man, but I know that I can do ANYTHING through God Almighty, whom strengthens me.

Belier13

  • Guest
Question for Servers
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2006, 01:37:51 am »
I don't care and I will tell you that !


I don't care !
Logged

PIE

  • Posts: 1471
  • Turrets: +96/-52
    • http://www.mercenariesguild.net
Question for Servers
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2006, 03:05:22 am »
Quote from: "confess"
poll added.

LOL.. options are the same... obviously you have your mind made up already (0o)..
Logged

Confess

  • Posts: 237
  • Turrets: +25/-15
    • http://sstcentral.com
Question for Servers
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2006, 05:08:48 am »
No, I still have no idea which is best for Tremulous SERVERS. Im getting told 2 different things.
Logged
know that I myself cannot do anything, that I will fall, and that I am a sinful man, but I know that I can do ANYTHING through God Almighty, whom strengthens me.

PIE

  • Posts: 1471
  • Turrets: +96/-52
    • http://www.mercenariesguild.net
Question for Servers
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2006, 05:24:34 am »
Quote from: "confess"
No, I still have no idea which is best for Tremulous SERVERS. Im getting told 2 different things.

... but i mean.. in your poll.. both options are the same.. take a look...
Logged

Confess

  • Posts: 237
  • Turrets: +25/-15
    • http://sstcentral.com
Question for Servers
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2006, 06:01:39 am »
Crap, I cant fix it either.

The first one is Intel Pentium D 930 ~ 2 x 3.2ghz (2x 2mb cache), and the second is hte Opteron. Note that :P
Logged
know that I myself cannot do anything, that I will fall, and that I am a sinful man, but I know that I can do ANYTHING through God Almighty, whom strengthens me.

rasz_pl

  • Guest
Question for Servers
« Reply #13 on: July 30, 2006, 10:38:23 am »
Quote from: "kevlarman"
Quote from: "rasz_pl"
http://www.3dnews.ru/documents/12137/quake3.gif

ZERO performance boost from the second core

Why would you want to buy opteron for this beats me. And WHY would you like to upgrade CPU for ONE Q3 server beats me again.
yes, because the fps is a good measurement of server performance </sarcasm>. depending on how it is written, the server could get a huge increase in performance from having a second core, or it could get virtually no benefit, but the client is completely unrelated which of those will happen


well actually NOT in Quake engines :) FPS is EXACTLY linear to the performance you will get from the server, and second core is USELESS
Logged

Teiman

  • Posts: 286
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Question for Servers
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2006, 05:40:09 pm »
I dont like HT, soo the other option is better. HT smell like something you disable at first problem.

On linux most people like the AMD options, and this is important If your server will run linux or a unix based OS.
Logged

Howitzer

  • Posts: 269
  • Turrets: +0/-1
Question for Servers
« Reply #15 on: July 30, 2006, 06:55:42 pm »
Teiman, your post is full of shit :)
HyperThreading has never caused any problems whatsoever. (not talking about personal experience)

On linux, most people favor Intel, although it doesn't matter if you have an intel or AMD processor since they're both i386 based.
Also, Linux = an unix based OS.

You tried to be smart by sticking some computer terms together? :P
Logged

PHREAK

  • Posts: 344
  • Turrets: +3/-2
Question for Servers
« Reply #16 on: July 30, 2006, 07:10:36 pm »
Quote from: "Howitzer"
...
Also, Linux = an unix based OS....


While Linux = UNIX based OS, not all unix based OS's are linux. So tieman is as right as it gets about that.
Logged
Yelling at team mates since 2006!

PIE

  • Posts: 1471
  • Turrets: +96/-52
    • http://www.mercenariesguild.net
Question for Servers
« Reply #17 on: July 30, 2006, 07:14:24 pm »
Quote from: "PHREAK"
Quote from: "Howitzer"
...
Also, Linux = an unix based OS....


While Linux = UNIX based OS, not all unix based OS's are linux. So tieman is as right as it gets about that.

Technically linux is not an os.. and its unix like, not unix based..
Logged

Howitzer

  • Posts: 269
  • Turrets: +0/-1
Question for Servers
« Reply #18 on: July 30, 2006, 08:34:01 pm »
Okay i stand corrected, linux is a kernel which can be made to form an OS that's part of the unix group (*BSD, AIX, ..)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up