The events of the ''Arab world''...

[Garion]

Here's another absolutely credible proof that war on Libya was wanted, thus it isn't for humanitarian reasons that it is happening :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8ya295inZc&feature=player_embedded


 

[Tremulant]

Neither video proves anything, one's speculation(who doesn't think that the financial system is severely screwed up and benefits no one but the banks?), the other's an anecdote about the previous US government, cut off before any great detail is discussed.

Videos of this sort are great for making those with a pre-existing belief in certain conspiracy theories smile, they do nothing to help explain to the rest of us why you consider those theories to be credible, and the moment we dismiss your "credible sources" we're told that it's simply a failing of our minds, brilliant.

Frankly, fuck this thread and its lolitics, it's time to let it die.

[Garion]

Frankly Tremulant, a man who was the general of the US air force army, the general Wesley Clark, admits, after having seen confidential documents that only important members of the US administration can see, that war on irak wasn't funded and that they plan to attack 6 other countries (Syria, Libya, Liban, Somalie, Soudan and Iran) , and that this was already decided in 2001, and that is nothing for you?

You're right Tremulant, just leave this thread, I suggest you go watch occidental medias, they will show you the path you should follow.

edit: Hell, the more I come up with credible things that speak for themselves, the more I get called an idiot by the retards of this community.

[RAKninja-Decepticon]

a quick search about former general clark reveals interesting things.  for one, he ran for president in 2004, but when it became apparent he would not win the primaries, he withdrew his bid to support hillary clinton.  when it became clear SHE would not win, he decided to endorse obama.  he is co-chairman of an ethanol lobbying group, and sits on the board of directors of BNK petroleum.  george soros owns a 20% stake in that company.  the same george soros that funds, in part, wikileaks.

yes, he may be telling the truth in this matter of out planned action in the middle east, but i doubt he is releasing this information for any good reason.

[Garion]

To say the least about General Clark, I'd say he's closer to the US official side of the medal than I am, so he probably believes in many things he've been told. This doesn't mean he had bad intentions. Also, this information is good because it allows us to connect dots together, but it is not necessary. You will see the war will continue on the countries that were named (I can tell you Syria and Iran are almost certain to come). And the reasons will be the same they gave already (they may not be all present) : war on terrorism, installing democracy, removing a dictator, fighting nuclear, need to help the civil war/revolution.

What's fun about what I'm telling you is that it will actually happen, and the other people who predicted events like these generally followed the same line of thoughts. I'm not here to argue, I'm here to tell.

[RAKninja-Decepticon]

oh i have no doubt that actions will play out in the middle east much as you describe.  i just have my doubts about the purpose of this man telling us this, confirming what is already known.  there are plenty of other sources that map out our campaign in the middle east.  you have but to look at history to know what nations will be involved.  just look at everywhere we've meddled since world war 2.  all of the coups and plots we've been involved with since that time are coming to fruition now.

[Garion]

This is what happens when a journalist of BBC meets reality :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqHHJfBF0Sg&feature=player_embedded

It's quite funny because the Libyans would surely have had the same speech if BBC actually asked them.

[StevenM]

stop smoking pot iabz.

[Garion]

It's still better than smoking some mass medias.

[StevenM]

ok then, keep smoking pot and come on HoN.

[Dracone]

I always thought that events in the "Arab world" could just be summed up by "really violent and irrational series of Michael Bay shorts."

[Garion]

Here's another journalist having a similar speech as Thierry Meyssan's speech. She was also stuck in the hotel Rixos (Pazuzu and the ddos guys would tell us it is the location where buck hungry journalist make up their silly stories) : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJgmKeuoCTE&feature=player_embedded

[Tremulant]

Is it impossible for you to find someone without a connection to Russia Today?

[Garion]

In fact, smart ass, these people were all outside Russia Today at first, they are simply interviewed by the people of Russia Today because Russia Today is a much more honest media than many, so when there are true journalists doing their jobs, they interview them without making them pass for crazies. But if that connection (the simple fact that they interviewed them) is too big for you...

edit : I will simply add, because it's important, that I already gave a good amount of documentation that came from elsewhere (for instance, infowars, voltairenet.org, etc..)

[Tremulant]

Russia Today is a much more honest media than many

Lay off the pot, there's a good chap. 

[Garion]

Russia Today is a much more honest media than many

Lay off the pot, there's a good chap. 

You should follow your own hints. If I believe Russia Today is a more honest media than many it is because they have invited a few persons who held a speech that I agree with. Their ethic toward these persons was much more professional, they didn't diabolize anyone, and this means a lot. Anyway, I won't even bother going further with you on this subject because you're a sophist. Keep up with the slogans if you please, because at this point all I see is abstract ideas.  (because you love smiley)