Author Topic: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.  (Read 34561 times)

kharnov

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 626
  • Turrets: +47/-791
    • Unvanquished
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #30 on: July 26, 2011, 03:09:11 am »
Yes. Reply to the 4chan retard. Yes!

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #31 on: July 26, 2011, 04:14:12 am »
Yes. Reply to the 4chan retard. Yes!
i know, i know.  it's a weakness of mine.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

TheLollingManv2

  • Posts: 50
  • Turrets: +1/-24
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #32 on: July 26, 2011, 04:55:43 am »
Seeing as how you only posted one definition without even looking up what BAIQ is you cannot say that the two are synonymous. Having a below average IQ doesn't make you a retard. Using your logic the average person in places such as Venezuela, South Africa, and Saudia Arabia are considered retards because their IQ falls into the below average category. So please go play gpp and get better instead of trying to use meaningless dictionary definitions. (that actually aren't correct either)




at the risk of feeding the troll and keeping the thread derailed, you have a skewed definition of IQ.  IQ is a measure of approximately how much you can learn.  those in underdeveloped nations do not suffer from low IQ, they are just generally uneducated.  ignorance is not the same thing as stupidity.  unless it is, of course, willful ignorance.  but i suspect that is not what we are discussing.



You're a retard lulz. IQ is a score based on tests it measures your intelligence not approximately how much you can learn. Those in uneducated countries DO suffer from low IQ because they are uneducated so by using your previous logic a below average IQ=Retard.


 :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade:

Plague Bringer

  • Posts: 3814
  • Turrets: +147/-187
U R A Q T

SirDude

  • Posts: 182
  • Turrets: +3/-33
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #34 on: July 26, 2011, 12:22:04 pm »


Really guys? Really?

Tremulant

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 1039
  • Turrets: +370/-58
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #35 on: July 26, 2011, 01:27:30 pm »
When sirdude wins a thread we all lose, time to stop, i think.
my knees by my face and my ass is being hammered

Qrntz

  • Posts: 847
  • Turrets: +204/-12
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #36 on: July 26, 2011, 01:32:25 pm »

You make up Qrntz, u always angry, just calmdown. :police:
I am stupid idiot who dares to open mouth and start debating

TheLollingManv2

  • Posts: 50
  • Turrets: +1/-24
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #37 on: July 26, 2011, 07:01:39 pm »
Quotient: A degree or amount of specified quality or characteristic.

http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=uza&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=quotient&tbs=dfn:1&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=Tk4uTuCzN4LEgQfd-4mhAQ&ved=0CB8QkQ4&biw=1280&bih=880

Not sure what you're trying to do there, but I suppose you helped me prove this retard wrong. Where duh kookes at?

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #38 on: July 26, 2011, 11:01:19 pm »
Quotient: A degree or amount of specified quality or characteristic.

http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=uza&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=quotient&tbs=dfn:1&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=Tk4uTuCzN4LEgQfd-4mhAQ&ved=0CB8QkQ4&biw=1280&bih=880

Not sure what you're trying to do there, but I suppose you helped me prove this retard wrong. Where duh kookes at?
man, i know i shouldent keep going, but it is too irresistible.

from plague's link:
The result of mathematical division. The I.Q. (Intelligence Quotient) is arrived at by dividing the person's mental age (as determined on the Binet test) by the person's chronologic age and multiplying by 100. So if a child scores at the 8-year old level but is only 6, the I.Q. is 8/6 X 100=125.

you might want want to read up on the stanford Binet test as well.

i now have no doubt that you are indeed mentally retarded, and as such should be kept far away from the internet without supervision.  or, you read "trolling for dummies" and are trying to impress the rest of your prepubescent friends from whatever chan-clone you came from.

now, if you dont mind, plague and i were having a jolly good argument about shit no one cares about that will not make any difference to the development of the game.  kindly crawl back under whatever rock formerly housed you.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

Plague Bringer

  • Posts: 3814
  • Turrets: +147/-187
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #39 on: July 26, 2011, 11:02:23 pm »
Quotient: A degree or amount of specified quality or characteristic.

http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=uza&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=quotient&tbs=dfn:1&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=Tk4uTuCzN4LEgQfd-4mhAQ&ved=0CB8QkQ4&biw=1280&bih=880

Not sure what you're trying to do there, but I suppose you helped me prove this retard wrong. Where duh kookes at?
I wasn't really taking sides, but I definitely agree with RAKninja-Decepticon here. :)
U R A Q T

TheLollingManv2

  • Posts: 50
  • Turrets: +1/-24
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #40 on: July 26, 2011, 11:46:14 pm »
Quotient: A degree or amount of specified quality or characteristic.

http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=uza&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=quotient&tbs=dfn:1&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=Tk4uTuCzN4LEgQfd-4mhAQ&ved=0CB8QkQ4&biw=1280&bih=880

Not sure what you're trying to do there, but I suppose you helped me prove this retard wrong. Where duh kookes at?
man, i know i shouldent keep going, but it is too irresistible.

from plague's link:
The result of mathematical division. The I.Q. (Intelligence Quotient) is arrived at by dividing the person's mental age (as determined on the Binet test) by the person's chronologic age and multiplying by 100. So if a child scores at the 8-year old level but is only 6, the I.Q. is 8/6 X 100=125.

you might want want to read up on the stanford Binet test as well.

i now have no doubt that you are indeed mentally retarded, and as such should be kept far away from the internet without supervision.  or, you read "trolling for dummies" and are trying to impress the rest of your prepubescent friends from whatever chan-clone you came from.

now, if you dont mind, plague and i were having a jolly good argument about shit no one cares about that will not make any difference to the development of the game.  kindly crawl back under whatever rock formerly housed you.

You have still yet prove your point of IQ is a measure of approximately how much you can learn. Also you might not want to give credit to the website you're getting your arguments from since all you did was copy and paste that example.  And judging by your contributions and ideas you've posted on these forums for as long as you've been here I also have no doubt that you are indeed mentally retarded.

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #41 on: July 27, 2011, 12:33:55 am »
Also you might not want to give credit to the website you're getting your arguments from since all you did was copy and paste that example.



from plague's link:

mmmm hmm.

so, vape was it?  buy one of the updated editions of trolling for dummies, or explain your recent head injury.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

Plague Bringer

  • Posts: 3814
  • Turrets: +147/-187
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #42 on: July 27, 2011, 01:34:57 am »
LOL it's Vape. Haven't seen him around in fucking ages.
U R A Q T

Flux

  • Posts: 221
  • Turrets: +88/-18
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #43 on: July 27, 2011, 05:23:27 pm »
This lolthread is entirely useless bs.

TheLollingManv2

  • Posts: 50
  • Turrets: +1/-24
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #44 on: July 27, 2011, 07:38:22 pm »
Also you might not want to give credit to the website you're getting your arguments from since all you did was copy and paste that example.



from plague's link:

mmmm hmm.

so, vape was it?  buy one of the updated editions of trolling for dummies, or explain your recent head injury.

Why would you copy and paste that from his link especially because it doesn't contribute to your argument that a below average IQ=A Retard

Plague Bringer

  • Posts: 3814
  • Turrets: +147/-187
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #45 on: July 27, 2011, 11:39:12 pm »
Regardless of whether or not IQ means "potential" or "current" intelligence, I do believe RAKninja-Decepticon is right in saying that low IQ is the determining factor in discerning whether or not someone is retarded.
U R A Q T

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #46 on: July 27, 2011, 11:43:47 pm »
ah, so it was trolling for dummies.  how quaint.

you could have at least taken the time to learn about the great trolls in the history of the internet.  such as the pickle guy.

pretending to be a retard is so played out, man.  you werent even able to keep yourself incognito for a full month.

oh, and just because i hate seeing an unbridged gap in logic:

IQ = mental age / chronological age * 100.  below average IQ indicates your mental age is lower than chronological age.  therefore, by definition, your mental development has been retarded..... making you a retard.


edit: tapped "1" too many times.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2011, 03:23:16 am by RAKninja-Decepticon »
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

Tremulant

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 1039
  • Turrets: +370/-58
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #47 on: July 28, 2011, 12:20:00 am »
I'm just going to leave this here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_retardation

I can't believe i'm finding the lolling man less annoying than plague and rak at this point, hmm, no, maybe i can...
my knees by my face and my ass is being hammered

Plague Bringer

  • Posts: 3814
  • Turrets: +147/-187
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #48 on: July 28, 2011, 12:52:06 am »
Tremulant wins. qq
To be retarded is to be slowed. Therefore to be mental retardation = mental slowness. Semantic =/= science. I've been arguing semantics, though I think RAKninja-Decepticon may have been on the science side of things.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2011, 12:53:53 am by Plague Bringer »
U R A Q T

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #49 on: July 28, 2011, 03:28:34 am »
Tremulant wins. qq
To be retarded is to be slowed. Therefore to be mental retardation = mental slowness. Semantic =/= science. I've been arguing semantics, though I think RAKninja-Decepticon may have been on the science side of things.
nah, he broke rule whatevernumber of arguing on the internet.

lolwiki.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

Anonymoose

  • Posts: 145
  • Turrets: +5/-17
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #50 on: July 28, 2011, 04:14:04 am »
You're a retard lulz. IQ is a score based on tests it measures your intelligence not approximately how much you can learn. Those in uneducated countries DO suffer from low IQ because they are uneducated so by using your previous logic a below average IQ=Retard.


 :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade: :grenade:
How long is a piece of string?
Don't you mind to tell me what you nickname meens, cause in my vocabulary there is only anon and a moose ???

TheLollingManv2

  • Posts: 50
  • Turrets: +1/-24
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #51 on: July 30, 2011, 08:10:19 pm »
ah, so it was trolling for dummies.  how quaint.

you could have at least taken the time to learn about the great trolls in the history of the internet.  such as the pickle guy.

pretending to be a retard is so played out, man.  you werent even able to keep yourself incognito for a full month.

oh, and just because i hate seeing an unbridged gap in logic:

IQ = mental age / chronological age * 100.  below average IQ indicates your mental age is lower than chronological age.  therefore, by definition, your mental development has been retarded..... making you a retard.


edit: tapped "1" too many times.

I actually haven't been pretending to be a retard, I mentioned me having a BAIQ, but never stated I was a retard. And I've used this name many times in-game it's really not hard to find out who this account belongs to, but don't worry I have many other accounts that I've managed to keep myself incognito.

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #52 on: July 30, 2011, 09:52:23 pm »
I actually haven't been pretending to be a retard, I mentioned me having a BAIQ, but never stated I was a retard. And I've used this name many times in-game it's really not hard to find out who this account belongs to, but don't worry I have many other accounts that I've managed to keep myself incognito.
IQ = mental age / chronological age * 100.  below average IQ indicates your mental age is lower than chronological age.  therefore, by definition, your mental development has been retarded..... making you a retard.

below average IQ is a nicer way of saying this.  i suggest you look up george carlin's bit on "the pussification of america".  we live in a day and age where no one wants to hurt someone else's feelings with a mean sounding word.

as for staying hidden, i feel this is mainly because no one with sufficient privileges gives a flying fuck.  it really isnt difficult to cross reference server connection logs.  hell, it would take less effort to write a script that does so for you.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

TheLollingManv2

  • Posts: 50
  • Turrets: +1/-24
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #53 on: July 31, 2011, 12:07:05 am »
I actually haven't been pretending to be a retard, I mentioned me having a BAIQ, but never stated I was a retard. And I've used this name many times in-game it's really not hard to find out who this account belongs to, but don't worry I have many other accounts that I've managed to keep myself incognito.
IQ = mental age / chronological age * 100.  below average IQ indicates your mental age is lower than chronological age.  therefore, by definition, your mental development has been retarded..... making you a retard.

below average IQ is a nicer way of saying this.  i suggest you look up george carlin's bit on "the pussification of america".  we live in a day and age where no one wants to hurt someone else's feelings with a mean sounding word.

as for staying hidden, i feel this is mainly because no one with sufficient privileges gives a flying fuck.  it really isnt difficult to cross reference server connection logs.  hell, it would take less effort to write a script that does so for you.

I'm just going to leave this here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_retardation

I can't believe i'm finding the lolling man less annoying than plague and rak at this point, hmm, no, maybe i can...



"It has historically been defined as an Intelligence Quotient score under 70.[1] Once focused almost entirely on cognition, the definition now includes both a component relating to mental functioning and one relating to individuals' functional skills in their environment. As a result, a person with a below-average intelligence quotient (BAIQ) may not be considered mentally retarded"

1. BAIQ is not synonymous with retard as you've stated previously
2. Nobody "gives a flying fuck" about the ramblings of an alcoholic mediocre comedian. So keep your "I suggest you look up" bullshit to yourself.
3. If nobody gave a fuck they wouldn't have figured out who I was in the first place.
4. You feed the "trolls" more than you feed in-game.




« Last Edit: July 31, 2011, 12:20:45 am by TheLollingManv2 »

Plague Bringer

  • Posts: 3814
  • Turrets: +147/-187
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #54 on: July 31, 2011, 03:50:00 am »
TheTrollingManv2:

ONE: Attacking a person and not their arguements is fallacious and makes you look like a douche.

TWO: You cannot argue science vs. semantics. Whoever started the argument is right because, while both definitions are (technically) valid, you're arguing that they are not. To be slowed = to be retarded. Therefore mental slowness = mental retardation. Semantically speaking.
U R A Q T

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #55 on: August 04, 2011, 05:06:46 am »
i feed and feed and feed, yet at the end of the game, my score isnt much different than yours.  we place near each other on the leaderbords consistently.  i suppose that says more about you than me, as i tell everyone - i'm nothing special.

i seem to remember you talking a bit of shit in a clan thread.  as clans are the seeds of drama, i assume you'd know of no faster way to be "looked up".  the only reason anyone gave a fuck is because you were talking shit.... and i'm sure at least one person wondered if you could back it up.

if you dont like drunken rambling, allow me to again serve you the gist.  unfortunately, you are just smart enough to know what "retard" means, in the common vernacular.  they(the american psychiatric board, or whatever the institution that published the digest of mental illnesses and such) create these labels for you, the patient.  they know words like "retard" and "he is retarded" hurt your widdle feelings.  so they made a special little bracket for you , "below average iq".  still, by definition of your IQ, your mental age has been retarded, held back.  it does not measure up to your chronological age, unfettered by your mind's slow development.

oh, not to mention citing wikipedia in any internet disagreement is lol.  take the time to at least just cite the source the wiki used.  not only do i have to feed you, but i must teach you the ways of trolling as well.  you must have skipped past the "advanced" chapters in trolling for dummies, and only read up to chapter 5.  i seriously recommend chapter 6: "stealing sources while still doing your research the lazy way!"

when you are ready, return, and again try to snatch the pebble from my hand.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

Tremulant

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 1039
  • Turrets: +370/-58
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #56 on: August 04, 2011, 01:01:08 pm »
ONE: Arguing semantics makes you look like a douche.
fixed that for you.
my knees by my face and my ass is being hammered

Flux

  • Posts: 221
  • Turrets: +88/-18
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #57 on: August 04, 2011, 01:04:03 pm »
rak ninja u have [baslick][gragner] next to your name??

Plague Bringer

  • Posts: 3814
  • Turrets: +147/-187
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #58 on: August 04, 2011, 06:17:17 pm »
ONE: Arguing semantics makes you look like a douche.
fixed that for you.
Yes, that too. My point stands.
U R A Q T

TheLollingManv2

  • Posts: 50
  • Turrets: +1/-24
Re: Concepts for problems. Reference Thread.
« Reply #59 on: August 04, 2011, 10:41:41 pm »
i feed and feed and feed, yet at the end of the game, my score isnt much different than yours.  we place near each other on the leaderbords consistently.  i suppose that says more about you than me, as i tell everyone - i'm nothing special.

I would really like to see proof of this. Sure we might place close to each other on the scoreboard, but there's probably a significant point gap.


i seem to remember you talking a bit of shit in a clan thread.  as clans are the seeds of drama, i assume you'd know of no faster way to be "looked up".  the only reason anyone gave a fuck is because you were talking shit.... and i'm sure at least one person wondered if you could back it up.

Clan's are not only the "seeds of drama", but they're what's keeping this game alive. Sure I talk shit, why not? I have backed it up in the past and I can back it up now.

oh, not to mention citing wikipedia in any internet disagreement is lol.  take the time to at least just cite the source the wiki used.  not only do i have to feed you, but i must teach you the ways of trolling as well.  you must have skipped past the "advanced" chapters in trolling for dummies, and only read up to chapter 5.  i seriously recommend chapter 6: "stealing sources while still doing your research the lazy way!"


You "teaching me the ways of trolling" while you're currently being "trolled"