Author Topic: Why 1.2 and not 2.0?  (Read 21468 times)

Rubuco

  • Posts: 42
  • Turrets: +0/-5
Re: Why 1.2 and not 2.0?
« Reply #30 on: November 16, 2011, 10:39:07 pm »
Tremulos is dead and won't rise again

kharnov

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 626
  • Turrets: +47/-791
    • Unvanquished
Re: Why 1.2 and not 2.0?
« Reply #31 on: November 17, 2011, 05:03:02 am »
Tremulos is dead and won't rise again

TremZ.

Rubuco

  • Posts: 42
  • Turrets: +0/-5
Re: Why 1.2 and not 2.0?
« Reply #32 on: November 20, 2011, 09:20:43 am »

Qrntz

  • Posts: 847
  • Turrets: +204/-12

You make up Qrntz, u always angry, just calmdown. :police:
I am stupid idiot who dares to open mouth and start debating

Volt

  • Posts: 256
  • Turrets: +66/-54

jm82792

  • Posts: 630
  • Turrets: +9/-34
Re: Why 1.2 and not 2.0?
« Reply #35 on: November 20, 2011, 09:52:43 pm »
Not zombie, more like (insidious and rough villain voice) "World Domination!"

NexusForever

  • Posts: 27
  • Turrets: +1/-3
    • NEXUS clansite
Re: Why 1.2 and not 2.0?
« Reply #36 on: November 22, 2011, 02:13:40 am »
Interesting thread...

Qrntz

  • Posts: 847
  • Turrets: +204/-12
Re: Why 1.2 and not 2.0?
« Reply #37 on: November 22, 2011, 02:40:35 pm »

You make up Qrntz, u always angry, just calmdown. :police:
I am stupid idiot who dares to open mouth and start debating