Author Topic: Tremulous VS Natural Selection!  (Read 24417 times)

Lava Croft

  • Guest
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« on: August 26, 2006, 11:06:51 am »
Hello fellow Tremulous players! It seems there is a HUGE amount of people who need enlightment! Please check the following url and bring light into their dark, cold lives!

Click Me!

Stof

  • Posts: 1343
  • Turrets: +1/-1
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2006, 11:23:37 am »
On other forums, this kind of post would be cause for a temporary ban.

But this is for a good cause, although I doubt there is much worth to save in the HL/CS community 8)
urphy's rules of combat
8 ) Teamwork is essential; it gives the enemy someone else to shoot at.
18 ) Make it too tough for the enemy to get in and you can't get out.

vcxzet

  • Guest
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2006, 11:23:45 am »
aww poor guys They think trem is a NS clone written on q2 engine
wheeeeeeee

Predalienator

  • Posts: 90
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2006, 11:39:06 am »
Their comments on trem are completely biased.And calling it ugly :roll: Its far more better looking than any mod based on HL will ever be.

Stof

  • Posts: 1343
  • Turrets: +1/-1
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2006, 12:18:57 pm »
Oh, i've seen some trem player has posted in there, but he hasn't posted the mandatory OBJECTION ! BAAAAD. let's give them a taste of flash powered tro^H^H^Harguments ! :P
urphy's rules of combat
8 ) Teamwork is essential; it gives the enemy someone else to shoot at.
18 ) Make it too tough for the enemy to get in and you can't get out.

Lava Croft

  • Guest
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2006, 12:44:55 pm »
Anyone recall the password which would let you download the Tremulous beta?  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:

Ksempac

  • Posts: 261
  • Turrets: +1/-1
    • http://www.ksempac.info/blog
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2006, 03:36:31 pm »
Quote from: "Stof"
Oh, i've seen some trem player has posted in there, but he hasn't posted the mandatory OBJECTION ! BAAAAD. let's give them a taste of flash powered tro^H^H^Harguments ! :P


lol XD
I m not sure the admins of the forum would have appreciated a first post with a big OBJECTION
:p
url=http://tremulous.net][/url]

PHREAK

  • Posts: 344
  • Turrets: +3/-2
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2006, 04:47:58 pm »
It's cute how not even a single NS monkey can make more then one coherent sentence per post, often resulting in simple shout-outs such as "rip off", "NS Clone yo!", etc.

Poor morons.
Yelling at team mates since 2006!

Bajsefar

  • Posts: 597
  • Turrets: +49/-39
Re: Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2006, 05:40:40 pm »
Quote from: "Lava Croft"
Please check the following url and bring light into their dark, cold lives!

Click Me!

Done. im not sure how good a job i did on it though.

Paradox

  • Posts: 2612
  • Turrets: +253/-250
    • Paradox Designs
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2006, 05:51:23 pm »
Lol, flaming us when we cant even see it, what asshats.

∧OMG ENTROPY∧

Captain Ventris

  • Posts: 163
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2006, 07:15:17 pm »
You know, all I've ever seen of NS fans are dim-witted trolls who think everything ripped off of NS.

Paradox

  • Posts: 2612
  • Turrets: +253/-250
    • Paradox Designs
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #11 on: August 27, 2006, 02:04:52 am »
OMG! Super Mario Brothers is a rip off of NS!

∧OMG ENTROPY∧

Captain Ventris

  • Posts: 163
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #12 on: August 27, 2006, 02:29:06 am »
Quote from: "Paradox"
OMG! Super Mario Brothers is a rip off of NS!


OMG THOSE WHITE RECTANGLES BOUNCING THAT SQUARE!

THATS FROM NS!!!

Basilisco

  • Posts: 592
  • Turrets: +24/-5
    • http://wilhelmrahn.googlepages.com/
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2006, 02:33:26 am »
ZOMG WE EVEN RIPPED OFF THEIR TURRET-STACKING MORONS!


:D

Paradox

  • Posts: 2612
  • Turrets: +253/-250
    • Paradox Designs
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2006, 05:17:07 am »
Holy crap, that game looks like shit.
The turrets in trem at least follow physics, and arent so tiny that the mere force of a decient sized bullet would in real life catapult the turrets across the universe.

∧OMG ENTROPY∧

Ksempac

  • Posts: 261
  • Turrets: +1/-1
    • http://www.ksempac.info/blog
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #15 on: August 27, 2006, 06:46:13 am »
Quote from: "Paradox"
Holy crap, that game looks like shit.
The turrets in trem at least follow physics, and arent so tiny that the mere force of a decient sized bullet would in real life catapult the turrets across the universe.


you re doing with ns exactly what they are doing with trem : you re judging the hole game on a single screenshot. :roll:
url=http://tremulous.net][/url]

Radz

  • Posts: 1
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #16 on: August 27, 2006, 08:55:21 am »
Ksempac is correct, nearly everything you guys have said here is going against what you also claim ‘we/Nsplayer are doing’

Quote from: "Paradox"
Lol, flaming us when we cant even see it, what asshats.


Honestly paradox you fail. infact everyone here is a pretty big disgrace to Tremulous, the thread posted on Nsplayer.net was to let everyone aware there is a similar game to ns, your more likely to get players from ns, then a completely different game and vice versa.

there was little to no flaming before the two tremulous players posted, and compare the amount of smack talk in this thread to the nsplayer one.
As I said on Nsplayer if this thread is an example on how your community works it defiantly put me off playing. Ever.
splayer.net

Ksempac

  • Posts: 261
  • Turrets: +1/-1
    • http://www.ksempac.info/blog
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #17 on: August 27, 2006, 09:54:15 am »
Quote from: "Radz"
Ksempac is correct, nearly everything you guys have said here is going against what you also claim ‘we/Nsplayer are doing’

Quote from: "Paradox"
Lol, flaming us when we cant even see it, what asshats.


Honestly paradox you fail. infact everyone here is a pretty big disgrace to Tremulous, the thread posted on Nsplayer.net was to let everyone aware there is a similar game to ns, your more likely to get players from ns, then a completely different game and vice versa.

there was little to no flaming before the two tremulous players posted, and compare the amount of smack talk in this thread to the nsplayer one.
As I said on Nsplayer if this thread is an example on how your community works it defiantly put me off playing. Ever.


Stop quoting my name to say crap. I dont like stupid people who says something based on little to no information only to look good. That's true for NS or Trem players.
On one hand, Paradox said a stupid thing, i didn t like it and i pointed out that fact.
However, on the other hand, the topic on NS was far from being fair with most of the posts consisting of a single sentence with no argumentation in it. That's why i posted on the NS forum : I gave some real information and argumentation in the topic. So dont quote my name here to say that NS players are so nice and so much better than the Trem community. :evil:
url=http://tremulous.net][/url]

Odin

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 1767
  • Turrets: +113/-204
    • My Website
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #18 on: August 27, 2006, 10:24:09 am »
Quote from: "Basilisco"
ZOMG WE EVEN RIPPED OFF THEIR TURRET-STACKING MORONS!


:D
Why does that game's weapons look so cool compared to ours?

Aninhumer

  • Posts: 116
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #19 on: August 27, 2006, 10:28:30 am »
Quote from: "Ksempac"
Quote from: "Paradox"
Holy crap, that game looks like shit.
The turrets in trem at least follow physics, and arent so tiny that the mere force of a decient sized bullet would in real life catapult the turrets across the universe.


you re doing with ns exactly what they are doing with trem : you re judging the hole game on a single screenshot. :roll:

And what's more, a lot of the "shit" in that picture comes from jpg compression.

jal

  • Posts: 249
  • Turrets: +8/-7
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #20 on: August 27, 2006, 11:17:38 am »
I'm shocked that the word hasn't been said in this thread before. I will do, see: "Gloom".

Lava Croft

  • Guest
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #21 on: August 27, 2006, 12:18:10 pm »
The only reason this was posted is to let Tremulous players know there are certain people who judge our entire game by one screenshot. I wasn't counting on people like Paradox going down that same road. This was meant as a lightweight-joke, exactly what I think Natural Selection is, a light-weight game. Lacking both the 'toughness' of Gloom and 'cuteness' of Tremulous.
That doesn't mean NS has no right to exist, there always has to be a lesser contestant.

Dj_Pong

  • Posts: 84
  • Turrets: +0/-1
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #22 on: August 27, 2006, 12:41:33 pm »
Quote from: "Basilisco"
ZOMG WE EVEN RIPPED OFF THEIR TURRET-STACKING MORONS!


:D

Looks good  :o
img]http://img77.imageshack.us/img77/3550/slapneger7qc.gif[/img]

[db@]Megabite

  • Posts: 613
  • Turrets: +3/-0
    • http://www.tremulous.info
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #23 on: August 27, 2006, 12:44:31 pm »
Quote from: "Dj_Pong"
F*ck all the Admins! They are losers one by one!


pssssst, without admins there wouldn't be servers to play on... ;)

Danny
url=http://www.tremulous.info][/url]


Delvin

  • Posts: 10
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #24 on: August 27, 2006, 04:32:31 pm »
Wow. The replies at the NS forum are incredibly arrogant. Pretty much everyone is saying "It sucks. NS is better", without giving any reasons. I doubt some of them actually tried it... Critic is perfectly fine, but not like that.

I'm not getting into this conversation other than that. Some years ago, I discovered NS, and wanted to try it, because it looked incredible. I never got it to work, though. Now I don't even have a copy of HL1 anymore. I might check it out if they'll get the Source version finished, but as it's now, I'd bet that it feels even older than Trem.  (Which was one "reason" as to why NS>Trem)

edit: Made some parts slightly more friendly

Jimmyup

  • Posts: 5
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #25 on: August 27, 2006, 06:52:48 pm »
i like some hl mods... like plan of attack... anyway i dont really like css nubs that much and never played ns... i thought it was said that both were clones of something from quake......

Lava Croft

  • Guest
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #26 on: August 27, 2006, 06:57:50 pm »
OK, according to R1CH, I did a bad thing by posting this here, so I guess I gotta say I'm sorry and I didn't mean to do this.

Paradox

  • Posts: 2612
  • Turrets: +253/-250
    • Paradox Designs
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #27 on: August 27, 2006, 08:05:24 pm »
Sorry about that post earlier, just had to take out some anger on something.

∧OMG ENTROPY∧

Phenax

  • Posts: 49
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #28 on: August 27, 2006, 08:21:26 pm »
Tremulous wins IMO.
I can't say that Natural Selection is a bad game though.

I mean, before even getting to the game-content you have plusses.
Tremulous is COMPLETELY FREE.
Natural Selection requires Half-Life

Tremulous runs on UNIX systems, Windows, and MACs (Almost every modern OS)
Natural Selection runs on Windows-only.

Meh, and the giant alien that eats you is so annoying. Overall I've had much more fun playing Tremulous.

vcxzet

  • Guest
Tremulous VS Natural Selection!
« Reply #29 on: August 27, 2006, 08:38:27 pm »
PLUS halflife engine is crap for today But q3 engine is still good and since it is open source you can improve it