Author Topic: two people trying to get on the same server.  (Read 6028 times)

radeone

  • Posts: 10
  • Turrets: +0/-0
two people trying to get on the same server.
« on: November 29, 2006, 03:39:14 am »
we have a twin wan router and if i try to connect it gives my friend connection interrupted and on my side i get cl_parseservermessage illegible server request. same if we do it the other way around. if you want screenshots i can help.

radeone

  • Posts: 10
  • Turrets: +0/-0
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2006, 03:44:13 am »
also i get some error while he's connecting unwanted server message. ignored

Somethief

  • Posts: 284
  • Turrets: +1/-1
    • http://www.somethief.net/
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2006, 12:29:09 pm »
Does this happen with all servers ?
url=http://fi.tremulous.net/]Tremulous Suomi[/url]
My blog

radeone

  • Posts: 10
  • Turrets: +0/-0
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2006, 08:50:47 am »
yes

Somethief

  • Posts: 284
  • Turrets: +1/-1
    • http://www.somethief.net/
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2006, 12:12:17 pm »
Sounds weird but i guess you need to play on different servers  :-?
url=http://fi.tremulous.net/]Tremulous Suomi[/url]
My blog

rasz_pl

  • Guest
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2006, 12:53:58 pm »
he just said it happens on all servers :P

What router is that EXACTLY? double wan as in 2 ISP connected to it?

Diggs

  • Posts: 321
  • Turrets: +5/-11
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2006, 12:56:57 pm »
Something to check-

Be sure NAT (Network Address Translation) and DHCP are enabled on the router.

iggs
続けてゲーム

Somethief

  • Posts: 284
  • Turrets: +1/-1
    • http://www.somethief.net/
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2006, 03:15:13 pm »
Quote from: "Diggs"
Something to check-

Be sure NAT (Network Address Translation) and DHCP are enabled on the router.

iggs


I would rather check for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) since it's used for opening UDP receive ports (Atleast if you are running Windows, dunno if *nix cares about it). (It's prolly in advanced tab)
url=http://fi.tremulous.net/]Tremulous Suomi[/url]
My blog

Somethief

  • Posts: 284
  • Turrets: +1/-1
    • http://www.somethief.net/
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2006, 03:16:21 pm »
Quote from: "rasz_pl"
he just said it happens on all servers :P

What router is that EXACTLY? double wan as in 2 ISP connected to it?


He said it happens when connecting to the SAME server from two machines, not two different servers  :wink:
url=http://fi.tremulous.net/]Tremulous Suomi[/url]
My blog

radeone

  • Posts: 10
  • Turrets: +0/-0
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2006, 03:43:31 pm »
xincom dpg502 is the router yes two isp's we have enabled almost everything and we split the ip's of the isps between each other so when i go to an ipchecking website or ipconfig we have different ip's i think its something with the routing for sure but such shitty error messages really dont help.

tjw

  • Posts: 210
  • Turrets: +10/-0
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2006, 07:12:27 pm »
Quote from: "radeone"
xincom dpg502 is the router yes two isp's we have enabled almost everything and we split the ip's of the isps between each other so when i go to an ipchecking website or ipconfig we have different ip's i think its something with the routing for sure but such shitty error messages really dont help.


Someone on my server had this same issue with this same router.  I tried to help him (them) work around it, but it seems that this router has a buggy NAT implementation and there was no possible workaround.

He even went as far as manually defining all incoming and outgoing packets for each machine to use seperate wan interfaces in the router config.  It still sent all the incoming packets from the server to whichever client tried to connect last.

Stof

  • Posts: 1343
  • Turrets: +1/-1
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2006, 10:41:16 pm »
Quote from: "Somethief"
Quote from: "Diggs"
Something to check-

Be sure NAT (Network Address Translation) and DHCP are enabled on the router.

iggs


I would rather check for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) since it's used for opening UDP receive ports (Atleast if you are running Windows, dunno if *nix cares about it). (It's prolly in advanced tab)

UPnP is irrelevent in that case :o

To the OP : try to update your router firmware to the latest version if isn't already : http://www.xincom.com/products/502/support.php
urphy's rules of combat
8 ) Teamwork is essential; it gives the enemy someone else to shoot at.
18 ) Make it too tough for the enemy to get in and you can't get out.

PWN-Quake

  • Posts: 12
  • Turrets: +0/-0
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #12 on: December 02, 2006, 05:14:56 am »
what brand of router and what driver software are you using?
also, are you running anything in the background?

rasz_pl

  • Guest
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2006, 11:58:23 am »
Quote from: "PWN-Quake"
what brand of router and what driver software are you using?


to hard to read te whole thread?

Quote from: "PWN-Quake"
also, are you running anything in the background?


and have a clue?

Caveman

  • Guest
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #14 on: December 02, 2006, 03:34:04 pm »
Sheeesh quake, please get rid of your annoying crappy pics.
It just does not compute when have nothing to say.

rasz_pl

  • Guest
two people trying to get on the same server.
« Reply #15 on: December 02, 2006, 04:41:17 pm »
that router doesnt support VPN termination :( but you could always try to set up VPN server on one of those 2 computers, and run VPN client on the other one, stupid router would not have to distinguish where to send trem packets and would not mess that up