two people trying to get on the same server.

[radeone]

we have a twin wan router and if i try to connect it gives my friend connection interrupted and on my side i get cl_parseservermessage illegible server request. same if we do it the other way around. if you want screenshots i can help.

[radeone]

also i get some error while he's connecting unwanted server message. ignored

[Somethief]

Does this happen with all servers ?

[radeone]

yes

[Somethief]

Sounds weird but i guess you need to play on different servers  :-?

[rasz_pl]

he just said it happens on all servers

What router is that EXACTLY? double wan as in 2 ISP connected to it?

[Diggs]

Something to check-

Be sure NAT (Network Address Translation) and DHCP are enabled on the router.

iggs

[Somethief]

Something to check-

Be sure NAT (Network Address Translation) and DHCP are enabled on the router.

iggs

I would rather check for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) since it's used for opening UDP receive ports (Atleast if you are running Windows, dunno if *nix cares about it). (It's prolly in advanced tab)

[Somethief]

he just said it happens on all servers

What router is that EXACTLY? double wan as in 2 ISP connected to it?

He said it happens when connecting to the SAME server from two machines, not two different servers  :wink:

[radeone]

xincom dpg502 is the router yes two isp's we have enabled almost everything and we split the ip's of the isps between each other so when i go to an ipchecking website or ipconfig we have different ip's i think its something with the routing for sure but such shitty error messages really dont help.

[tjw]

xincom dpg502 is the router yes two isp's we have enabled almost everything and we split the ip's of the isps between each other so when i go to an ipchecking website or ipconfig we have different ip's i think its something with the routing for sure but such shitty error messages really dont help.

Someone on my server had this same issue with this same router.  I tried to help him (them) work around it, but it seems that this router has a buggy NAT implementation and there was no possible workaround.

He even went as far as manually defining all incoming and outgoing packets for each machine to use seperate wan interfaces in the router config.  It still sent all the incoming packets from the server to whichever client tried to connect last.

[Stof]

Something to check-

Be sure NAT (Network Address Translation) and DHCP are enabled on the router.

iggs

I would rather check for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) since it's used for opening UDP receive ports (Atleast if you are running Windows, dunno if *nix cares about it). (It's prolly in advanced tab)

UPnP is irrelevent in that case

To the OP : try to update your router firmware to the latest version if isn't already : http://www.xincom.com/products/502/support.php

[PWN-Quake]

what brand of router and what driver software are you using?
also, are you running anything in the background?

[rasz_pl]

what brand of router and what driver software are you using?

to hard to read te whole thread?

also, are you running anything in the background?

and have a clue?

[Caveman]

Sheeesh quake, please get rid of your annoying crappy pics.
It just does not compute when have nothing to say.

[rasz_pl]

that router doesnt support VPN termination but you could always try to set up VPN server on one of those 2 computers, and run VPN client on the other one, stupid router would not have to distinguish where to send trem packets and would not mess that up