Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Timedemo  (Read 37503 times)

raf

  • Posts: 75
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Timedemo
« Reply #30 on: February 03, 2007, 02:26:23 pm »
640 * 480; fastest
pentium M, 1.86GHz , 768 mb ram, ati radeon x300; linux 2.6.18

avg fps: 47.9
Logged

Foobicam

  • Posts: 72
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Timedemo
« Reply #31 on: February 03, 2007, 06:40:00 pm »
Windows XP SP2
Pentium 4 2800 HT  (Family 15, Model 4, Stepping 1)
1 GB 533MHz DDR2 RAM
GeForce 7300 LE/PCI/SSE2 128 MB

High Quality, 1280x1024x32:   3067 frames, 90.4 sec, 33.9 fps

Fast + change to 800x600:  3067 frames, 77.7 sec, 39.5 fps
Logged
url=http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/472/foobvn0.jpg]Image Sig[/url] removed.

TinMan

  • Posts: 1019
  • Turrets: +49/-70
    • http://neonpulse.net
Timedemo
« Reply #32 on: February 05, 2007, 11:47:14 pm »
MacBook
Mac OS X 10.4.8
2 GHz Intel Core Duo
1 GB 667 Mhz DDR2 SDRAM

Default settings except that I changed the resolution with
Code: [Select]
/r_customwidth 1280
/r_customheight 800
/r_mode -1

It got: 149.7 seconds, 20.5 FPS
Logged
Code: [Select]
Linux: ~/.tremulous/base/
Mac: ~/Library/Application\ Support/Tremulous/base/
Windows: C:\Documents and Settings\username\Local Settings\Application Data\Tremulous\base\NeonPulse
http://neonpulse.net/media/games/tremulous/base/autoexec.cfg

Overdose

  • Posts: 396
  • Turrets: +52/-47
Timedemo
« Reply #33 on: July 03, 2007, 12:52:10 am »
I know this is an old topic but...

WinXP SP2
AMD Athlon64 3000+ (2.0 GHz)
1.5 GB RAM (PC3200 400 MHz)
80 GB 7200 RPM HDD
XFX nVidia 7300GT
1680x1050 resolution
~Average Settings

3067 Frames, 74.7 Seconds, 41.0 FPS.
I noticed the FPS drop to as low as 24 and as high as 73 during the demo.
Logged
Chocolate Milk.

R1CH

  • Posts: 79
  • Turrets: +3/-1
    • http://www.r1ch.net/
Timedemo
« Reply #34 on: July 03, 2007, 01:34:48 pm »
1680x1050, GeForce 6800 GT, Athlon 64 3200+, 1.5 GB. Trem settings on "high quality".

42.5 FPS with R1Trem with 4x anisotropic filtering
40.4 FPS with stock tremulous.exe with no anisotropic filtering

Strange results, although I did have a lot of apps running in the background.

 :human:
Logged

Computer[SU]

  • Posts: 188
  • Turrets: +9/-5
    • http://ClanZeroRisk.com
Timedemo
« Reply #35 on: July 03, 2007, 03:28:40 pm »
Macbook Pro
Mac OS X 10.4.10
2.33 GHz Intel Core Duo
2 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
ATI Radeon X1600, 256 MB VRAM

1440x900 Resolution
All graphics settings maxed

83.2 seconds, 36.8 FPS [range approx. 23-85, damn chainsuits]
Logged

Kaleo

  • Posts: 2098
  • Turrets: +176/-220
    • KaleoDesign
Timedemo
« Reply #36 on: July 03, 2007, 03:33:56 pm »
Quote from: "OverFlow"
amd athlon xp 1800+
radeon 9500
1GB pc133

1024x768
default settings

3067 frames
179.4 seconds
17.1 fps



I'm awesome.

You keep tellin' yourself that mate...
Logged
Quote from: Stannum
Thou canst not kill that which doth not live,
but you can blow it into chunky kibbles!
I has a cookie, and u can has a cookie, but i no givs u mai cookie...

Overdose

  • Posts: 396
  • Turrets: +52/-47
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #37 on: November 01, 2008, 08:44:31 pm »
Please don't get mad about my HUGE necro, but I thought this could be an educational bump. An entirely new generation of hardware is out and I wanted to gauge its performance.


Windows XP SP3
Intel E8400 overclocked to 3.6GHz
3GB DDR2-1066 RAM (4GB actually, but 32-bit OS)
EVGA GTX 260 @ 631/1360/1055
500GB Seagate Barracuda
1680x1050x32
Maximum in-game settings & 16xQ AA, 16x AF

3067 frames, 34.2 seconds: 89.7 fps
Logged
Chocolate Milk.

Bissig

  • Posts: 1309
  • Turrets: +103/-131
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #38 on: November 01, 2008, 09:15:44 pm »
Hmm, seeing as you have one of the fastest gpus, yet your fps is only about twice as high as the fastest old gfx cards, it seems CPUs evolved far less.. AND the game is completely CPU bound. Which is a shame considering the speed of nowadays cheap <50-100 dollar graphic cards.
Logged

Overdose

  • Posts: 396
  • Turrets: +52/-47
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #39 on: November 01, 2008, 09:22:35 pm »
If there were greater support for multi-threading I'm sure my score would be much, much higher; Probably over 100.
Logged
Chocolate Milk.

kevlarman

  • Posts: 2737
  • Turrets: +291/-295
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #40 on: November 01, 2008, 09:31:55 pm »
Quote from: YourMama on November 01, 2008, 09:22:35 pm
If there were greater support for multi-threading I'm sure my score would be much, much higher; Probably over 100.
the biggest difference would probably come from rewriting the renderer to support VBOs.
Logged
Quote from: Asvarox link=topic=8622.msg169333#msg169333
Ok let's plan it out. Asva, you are nub, go sit on rets, I will build, you two go feed like hell, you go pwn their asses, and everyone else camp in the hallway, roger?
the dretch bites.
-----
|..d| #
|.@.-##
-----

gimhael

  • Posts: 546
  • Turrets: +70/-16
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #41 on: November 02, 2008, 02:52:47 pm »
The link to the demo file seems to be dead. Does somebody have a working link ?
Logged

kevlarman

  • Posts: 2737
  • Turrets: +291/-295
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #42 on: November 02, 2008, 05:20:25 pm »
Quote from: gimhael on November 02, 2008, 02:52:47 pm
The link to the demo file seems to be dead. Does somebody have a working link ?

i actually think i might have a copy of it, but if i do it's in a tarball on a freebsd partition that doesn't boot atm.
Logged
Quote from: Asvarox link=topic=8622.msg169333#msg169333
Ok let's plan it out. Asva, you are nub, go sit on rets, I will build, you two go feed like hell, you go pwn their asses, and everyone else camp in the hallway, roger?
the dretch bites.
-----
|..d| #
|.@.-##
-----

Overdose

  • Posts: 396
  • Turrets: +52/-47
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #43 on: November 02, 2008, 06:44:14 pm »
timedemo1
Don't forget to follow the directions in the first post.
Logged
Chocolate Milk.

Archangel

  • Guest
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #44 on: November 02, 2008, 07:00:54 pm »
Intel Pentium 4 HT 2.8GHz (HT off)
768MB RAM (a 512mb pc2700 stick, and a pc3200 256mb stick)
nVidia GeForce 5200FX (GPU: 249.750mhz overclocked +20 mhz, RAM 405.000mhz, overclocked +30mhz)
Linux 2.6.27-luna-rc1
1024x768 fullscreen, shinytrem v12 and bloom enabled.
3067 frames, 199.6 seconds: 15.4 fps
Logged

Thorn

  • Guest
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #45 on: November 02, 2008, 08:30:41 pm »
3067 frames 55.6 seconds 55.2 fps
x86_64
Core2Duo E4400 OC'd at 2.3GHz
2048MB DDR2 800
Nvidia 7600GT
1680x1050 Fullscreen.
No AA/AF. Maxed out settings ( No extras such as bloom etc )



640x480
3067 frames 56.6 seconds 54.2 fps 8.0/18.5/38.0/5.2 ms

Eh?

« Last Edit: November 02, 2008, 08:39:40 pm by Thorn »
Logged

snb

  • Posts: 422
  • Turrets: +15/-265
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #46 on: November 02, 2008, 08:56:00 pm »
i dont get this thred... does it have somthing to do with that if i download that file and use it on tremulous, ill beable to see things in slow motion? or maybe go back in time?  i dont get it. whats with all that frame rate stuff and the ZOogersmale?
Logged
Half Life head crab by the way
Quote from: Annihilation on November 26, 2008, 03:21:48 am
On Topic:
My favorite type of metal has to be whatever type Demons and Wizards fall into.

Overdose

  • Posts: 396
  • Turrets: +52/-47
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #47 on: November 02, 2008, 09:26:48 pm »
When you start the demo it runs as fast as it can, the numbers you are given at the end are statistics.

3067 total frames in the demo (won't change for anyone)
56.6 seconds is the time it took to complete, lower is better
54.2 fps is your average frame rate throughout the demo, higher is better

This is like a makeshift benchmarking program for Tremulous.
Logged
Chocolate Milk.

rotacak

  • Posts: 761
  • Turrets: +39/-64
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #48 on: November 03, 2008, 05:55:20 pm »
Athlon XP 1800+
1 GB RAM DDR
Ati Radeon 9550 128 MB
All high settings, no AA, 1280x1024, tjw client.

With shiny trem and superpie's visual mod: 15,2 fps
Without: 16, 7 fps
Logged

Hellrider

  • Posts: 61
  • Turrets: +5/-2
    • My personal website
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #49 on: November 04, 2008, 07:40:43 pm »
3067 frames 64.2 seconds 47.8 fps

PowerPC
PowerMac G5 Dual Core @ 2GHz
1,5 GB DDR2 533Mhz
Nvidia 6600GT
1280x1024 Fullscreen.
Maxed out settings.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2008, 07:42:37 pm by Hellrider »
Logged

Superpie

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 339
  • Turrets: +105/-48
    • superpie.org
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #50 on: November 05, 2008, 12:53:04 am »
AMD Sempron LE-1300 @ 2.31ghz
2GB RAM @ 333mhz, cas latency 5
GeForce 9800gt 512mb @ 663mhz core and 1900mhz mem

All settings on "high", bloom on with samples set to 512, 1680x1050, antialiasing 16x, superpies vismod 2, tremfusion 0.0.1b3

3067 frames 61.9 seconds 49.5 fps 10.0/20.2/75.0/4.6 ms
« Last Edit: November 05, 2008, 12:55:33 am by Superpie »
Logged
Where is the good in goodbye? -Meredith Willson

Einstein

  • Posts: 81
  • Turrets: +12/-2
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #51 on: November 05, 2008, 03:37:04 pm »
I'm actually glad this has been revived, it's a cool project.

My results straight from my logfiles:
[10:21][47:59]3067 frames 42.8 seconds 71.7 fps 7.0/14.0/56.0/3.5 ms

on Ubuntu 8.10 64-bit
with 4 GB RAM, not sure of my "rated" frequency
Intel Core2 Duo T9300 rated at 2.50 GHz
running GNOME 2.24.1 on kernel 2.6.27-7-generic

With the exception of not capping my FPS, I ran this demo just as I normally do. I did not try to free up any CPU/memory/IO resources. Bloom is off, snaps is 40, everything is pretty normal. My system's resolution is 1440 x 900, 50 Hz, and Tremulous runs in a window (r_mode == 7).

I will love to get comprehensive information on all of these so I can find trends; this looks interesting!

Edit: by "normal" I mean highest graphics, net, etc. settings.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2008, 03:45:44 pm by Einstein »
Logged

Annihilation

  • Posts: 684
  • Turrets: +162/-197
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #52 on: November 11, 2008, 12:04:25 am »
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16 ghz
4 GB DDR2(1066) RAM
Nividia 9500GT 512 MB DDR2 Video Card

Fps 71.4

oh max settings
1024x768 fullscreen
« Last Edit: November 11, 2008, 12:34:57 am by Annihilation »
Logged
[11:33:20 PM] Kaine:
Quote from: KobraKaine
How do you perform goon-copulation if he doesn't play?
Quote from: PowerOverwhelming
We just get on VC and listen to camels dying until we orgasm

Bissig

  • Posts: 1309
  • Turrets: +103/-131
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #53 on: January 19, 2009, 07:16:55 am »
openSUSE 11.1 factory, kernel 2.6.27.10-2-default
AMD Athlon64 X2 4000+ (2x2.1 GHz)
2.0 GB RAM (DDR2-800)
Bunch of disks
NVidia 7300GS  512MB PCI-Ex16
1680x1050 resolution
All settings maximum, fullscreen

3067 Frames, 79.3 Seconds, 38.7 FPS.

Too bad I can't test the fried GF4Ti4200 anymore. I had the feeling it was a bit faster in certain areas (128bit memory bus?) and a bit slower in other areas. A GF FX5200 is slow as ass though. At least at that resolution.
Logged

Bissig

  • Posts: 1309
  • Turrets: +103/-131
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #54 on: February 25, 2009, 09:33:02 pm »
Hmm, I tried this with my new GF 9500GT with 512 MB RAM.

More or less same result. But I do get around 400 fps on startup at an empty server with uncapped fps...

This is seriously fucked.
Logged

Archangel

  • Guest
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #55 on: February 26, 2009, 04:07:23 am »
Quote from: Bissig on January 19, 2009, 07:16:55 am
Too bad I can't test the fried GF4Ti4200 anymore. I had the feeling it was a bit faster in certain areas (128bit memory bus?) and a bit slower in other areas. A GF FX5200 is slow as ass though. At least at that resolution.

If I remember correctly, the GeForce 4Ti cards were actually GF2 GPUs.

Arch Linux "Core Dump"
AMD Phenom X3 Tri-Core 2.4GHz (3x 2.95GHz at the moment)
4GB RAM (DDR2-800)
XFX GeForce 9800GTX+ XXX Black Edition 512MB (stock cooler at the moment.)
1600x1200 Res
Bloom, ShinyTrem, Global 16x AA

3067 frames 48.6 seconds 63.1 fps 7.0/15.9/70.0/3.9 ms

This is with Firefox and a lot of other shit running. So, maybe a bit better by itself.
Logged

Ivancool

  • Posts: 24
  • Turrets: +1/-5
    • http://tremulousclub.hostrocket.com
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #56 on: February 27, 2009, 05:25:36 pm »
Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 @2.66Ghz
2Gb RAM DDR2-800
XFX Geforce 8400GS 256MB
1680x1050 (DVI)
Risujin Client
Default Nvidia settings
Max Settings

3067 Frames 51.1 seconds 60.0 Fps
Logged

gimhael

  • Posts: 546
  • Turrets: +70/-16
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #57 on: March 03, 2009, 06:20:21 am »
Quote from: kevlarman on November 01, 2008, 09:31:55 pm
Quote from: YourMama on November 01, 2008, 09:22:35 pm
If there were greater support for multi-threading I'm sure my score would be much, much higher; Probably over 100.
the biggest difference would probably come from rewriting the renderer to support VBOs.
Try it out.
Logged

kevlarman

  • Posts: 2737
  • Turrets: +291/-295
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #58 on: March 03, 2009, 05:24:40 pm »
Quote from: gimhael on March 03, 2009, 06:20:21 am
Quote from: kevlarman on November 01, 2008, 09:31:55 pm
Quote from: YourMama on November 01, 2008, 09:22:35 pm
If there were greater support for multi-threading I'm sure my score would be much, much higher; Probably over 100.
the biggest difference would probably come from rewriting the renderer to support VBOs.
Try it out.
1) you shouldn't be mixing two patches together like that, and
2) you should be submitting this to ioq3
Logged
Quote from: Asvarox link=topic=8622.msg169333#msg169333
Ok let's plan it out. Asva, you are nub, go sit on rets, I will build, you two go feed like hell, you go pwn their asses, and everyone else camp in the hallway, roger?
the dretch bites.
-----
|..d| #
|.@.-##
-----

Ingar

  • Tremulous Developers
  • *
  • Posts: 554
  • Turrets: +302/-7
    • Ingar's projects on the Web
Re: Timedemo
« Reply #59 on: March 03, 2009, 05:57:35 pm »
Quote from: Ingar on January 31, 2007, 10:06:28 pm
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 2G RAM
NVidia GeForce 6600GT
1280x1024x32
4*AA (export __GL_FSAA_MODE=8 )
full gfx settings

3067 frames, 79.6 seconds: 38.5 fps

Interesting difference:

Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 2666Mhz + 8G RAM
NVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 640Mb
1680x1050
max settings

3067 frames 36.2 seconds 84.8 fps

Turning aniso/FSAA on or off doesn't make any difference.
Latest mg binary, 64bit linux
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Up