PierreF's patchset

[Greudin]

This is a set of patches (thank you all developpers !) arranged by PierreF's

Download :
http://trem.yi.org/tremwiki/Download

The list of patches :
http://trem.yi.org/tremwiki/Modification

It is currently used by the some eu servers : tHc, Amphetamines, Bricosoft, Excessive.


Developpers! Developpers! Clap! Clap!

[Caveman]

Great, another place that mirrors patches.

That said...

But the reason why this site exists is beyond me.

As for Pierre's genuine patches, they are available only via mail.

Sure he he posts the SVN he is actually using and giving a link to his source, but fails to mention what SVN-version he did use.
So the making of a diff to generate a patch is highly unlikly to succeed.

It is also quite nice that he gives proper credits to DASPRID, but why does the link to his patch not lead to the patch itself, as it should when making the words "LogTeamClass.patch" a link?

The same with Risujin's one-liner. Why is it omitted?
Because it's just one line?
Sorry but here is also a link missing and mandatory imho.

While the link to the AW-Patches leads to a selection against a number of SVN-Versions, it is kinda misleading then to list other devs patches under the same heading and thus making it look like they are all from us.


All in all i'd say this site should have stayed offline as it is not ready yet.

[kevlarman]

It is also quite nice that he gives proper credits to DASPRID, but why does the link to his patch not lead to the patch itself, as it should when making the words "LogTeamClass.patch" a link?

actually wolfwings wrote the patch, not DASPRiD

[PierreF]

Great, another place that mirrors patches.

That said...

But the reason why this site exists is beyond me.

It's mostly for people who wants to use my bundle of patch (mostly people i know from IRC)

As for Pierre's genuine patches, they are available only via mail.

Ok, I will make the .patch. I was too lazy to make them

Sure he he posts the SVN he is actually using and giving a link to his source, but fails to mention what SVN-version he did use.

It's writen on HomePage it's svn 909. I added this also on Modification page.

It is also quite nice that he gives proper credits to DASPRID, but why does the link to his patch not lead to the patch itself, as it should when making the words "LogTeamClass.patch" a link?

I don't make LogTeamClass a link... it's the wiki engine which make link any word with capital in the word. I will fix it.

The same with Risujin's one-liner. Why is it omitted?
Because it's just one line?
Sorry but here is also a link missing and mandatory imho.

I will fix this

While the link to the AW-Patches leads to a selection against a number of SVN-Versions, it is kinda misleading then to list other devs patches under the same heading and thus making it look like they are all from us.

The link leads to a selection against a number of svn-versions because Wraths patches didn't exist for svn-909 which I use.
I added note to remind that Wraths patches are a bundle of patches from other developers.


Thank for your commentaries, they will improve this wiki. (and it's a wiki, you can correct it if you see a mistake )

[khalsa]

May I just say:

Everyone should use the Patch tracker to avoid such problems.


Khalsa