Hud in SD , or forbid deconstruction in SD ?

[RedGuff]

Hello.
In SD, the hud of the construction kit says "0 BP", instead of "SD".
It's encouraging noobs to deconstruct something to get BP.   :eek:
Another solution is to forbid deconstruction in SD.  
Thanks.

[f0rqu3]

does it matter ?
if you have 0 bps you cant build anyway

[PIE]

And hence why they decon something, because they think maybe they can get some more BP back.. doesn't sound like a bad idea to me.. though most of them don't know what sudden death is anyway or what SD would stand for so that as an indicator alone wouldn't help much. Not being able to decon non-rebuildables in sd sounds like a decent idea.

[Plague Bringer]

Well; if it said SD and they were there to see it say a number, they might not try anything for frear it'll, like, self destruct or something.

[f0rqu3]

And hence why they decon something, because they think maybe they can get some more BP back.. doesn't sound like a bad idea to me.. though most of them don't know what sudden death is anyway or what SD would stand for so that as an indicator alone wouldn't help much. Not being able to decon non-rebuildables in sd sounds like a decent idea.

read the changes you can no longer decon in SD

[rdizzle]

Just make it a habit to !denybuild anyone unnamed and or new to your server.  Especially if they join at the onset of SD.

Good players often need to decon structs in SD before they blow up and damage other structs nearby, so a blanket decon disable would be disadvantageous to the humans.

[ShadowNinjaDudeMan]

You cant actually decon in SD.
 :roll:

[f0rqu3]

You cant actually decon in SD.
 :roll:

not in the svn version

[Plague Bringer]

And hence why they decon something, because they think maybe they can get some more BP back.. doesn't sound like a bad idea to me.. though most of them don't know what sudden death is anyway or what SD would stand for so that as an indicator alone wouldn't help much. Not being able to decon non-rebuildables in sd sounds like a decent idea.

read the changes you can no longer decon in SD

not in the svn version

Are you fucking retarted or do you just enjoy selfowning the shit out of yourself?

And if your defence is "the svn version is different" then you should've stated that you can decon in svn/

[f0rqu3]

And hence why they decon something, because they think maybe they can get some more BP back.. doesn't sound like a bad idea to me.. though most of them don't know what sudden death is anyway or what SD would stand for so that as an indicator alone wouldn't help much. Not being able to decon non-rebuildables in sd sounds like a decent idea.

read the changes you can no longer decon in SD

not in the svn version

Are you fucking retarted or do you just enjoy selfowning the shit out of yourself?

And if your defence is "the svn version is different" then you should've stated that you can decon in svn/

dude are you stupid or something
what I say is you can decon in stock 1.1.0 during SD
but you cant decon in the svn during SD
I said not in the svn version to emphasis that you can in the stock 1.1.0
if your brain cant handle it go jump off a cliff

[Stof]

Guys, chill out. Why do you always have to take everything is such an agresive tone :/

Remember that threads that turn into flames between members will be closed or cleansed sooner than later.

[Lava Croft]

I want to take Stof's comment even further and urge Plague Bringer to get his head out of his ass and stop flaming.

[Plague Bringer]

I want to take Stof's comment even further and urge Plague Bringer to get his head out of his ass and stop flaming.

Are you completely ignoring your gang's idiocy?

[Lava Croft]

I want to take Stof's comment even further and urge Plague Bringer to get his head out of his ass and stop flaming.

Are you completely ignoring your gang's idiocy?

First of all it's not my 'gang', and secondly, opinions hugely differ about who is the idiot here.

I think I speak for all the mods when I say we are just about done with all the goddamn flaming on these forums.

[Plague Bringer]

I want to take Stof's comment even further and urge Plague Bringer to get his head out of his ass and stop flaming.

Are you completely ignoring your gang's idiocy?

First of all it's not my 'gang', and secondly, opinions hugely differ about who is the idiot here.

I think I speak for all the mods when I say we are just about done with all the goddamn flaming on these forums.

As much as I despise you and your group of friends, I agree with the flaming issue. And FYI, fork is doing a lot of this stalking and flaming aswell, just look at the first post of the locked flamewar in offtopic. Just look at all the good threads him, maci, or jhaa ruined by flaming or mocking. I flame in defence, rarely do I go offensive.

[Steely Ann]

Just look at all the good threads him, masi, or jhaa ruined by flaming or mocking. I flame in defence, rarely do I go offensive.

Flaming "in defense" == Flaming.

// Meh.  My $0.02

[PIE]

Talking about flaming = wasting time = spammish. Especially when it doesn't have anything to do with the topic.

And hence why they decon something, because they think maybe they can get some more BP back.. doesn't sound like a bad idea to me.. though most of them don't know what sudden death is anyway or what SD would stand for so that as an indicator alone wouldn't help much. Not being able to decon non-rebuildables in sd sounds like a decent idea.

read the changes you can no longer decon in SD

Excellent! Yeah.. i'm not up to date on that stuff at the moment, just knew it sounded like a good idea. If you can't decon stuff then you'll probably get the message and the SD in the bp spot won't be too much help since you'll have 0bp and then you can't build obviously as stated before.

[jhaa]

Just look at all the good threads him, masi, or jhaa ruined by flaming or mocking.

Sorry but I just can't understand how a post where someone calls me a flamer ends up in a thread titled "Hud in SD , or forbid deconstruction in SD ?".
Maybe you accidentally posted in the wrong thread or something?

[Lava Croft]

Plague Bringer, I was talking to you. I was not talking to maci, jhaa or f0rque. I have already spoken to them, and you have no business with that. The next time you recieve 'criticism', it would be wise to not act like a 6-year old and start pointing at other people, just because they do it too. You just wasted the tiny bit of respect I had left for you.

Lets get back on topic now, shall we?

[Steely Ann]

No deconning about-to-explode turrets in SD?
That sounds reasonable.

[f0rqu3]

No deconning about-to-explode turrets in SD?
That sounds reasonable.

afaik it is still not in svn but on tjw's server
you can decon buildables that are about to explode
I dont remeber well but iirc you can also decon those buildable bombs anytime (even if your build timer isnt reseted )

[Plague Bringer]

-Ninja Edit-
 

Although I haven't built much recently, I haven't noticed that it was possible to decon destroyed buildings without regard to the build timer, I thought it was the same as deconning, a smaller timer. Are you sure about this?

[kevlarman]

-Ninja Edit-
 

Although I haven't built much recently, I haven't noticed that it was possible to decon destroyed buildings without regard to the build timer, I thought it was the same as deconning, a smaller timer. Are you sure about this?

he's refering to the changes involving g_markdeconstruct on trem.tjw.org (those changes aren't in svn though)

[Taiyo.uk]

No deconning about-to-explode turrets in SD?
That sounds reasonable.

I was under the impression that this was the case all the time, at least on the FunZone server it hasn't been possible to deconstruct structures in the short time before they explode at any point in the game, not just during SD.

[n00b pl0x]

taiyo thats extremely lame