Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars  (Read 6052 times)

Coolicus

  • Posts: 18
  • Turrets: +2/-10
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« on: December 31, 2007, 02:27:44 pm »
Hello to you all, first off.
Ok as the title might suggest, this topic is about SD and id's 2007 shooter, based on their free and excellent Return to castle wolfenstein:Enemy Territory. I just want to know if anyone else within the community has the game and what is their opinion of it.  ;D
Logged
-OMG ADMIN BAN T3H ALIENS THEY DEC0NNED R ARM LULZ!-Human ST1 on alien rush

Survivor

  • Posts: 1660
  • Turrets: +164/-159
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2007, 03:09:27 pm »
Excellent game, nice to just spend some hours playing and put it away. Also does a lot of things right which i'd wish i'd see in trem.
Logged
I’m busy. I’ll ignore you later.

_Equilibrium_

  • Posts: 1845
  • Turrets: +96/-89
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2007, 07:05:11 pm »
I tried Return to Castle Wolfenstein: ET and trem at the same time a long time ago. Trem was much more fun imo. So, I am not interested in a game based off of it. Recently, i've played Urban Terror a bit, which is fun. If I want a more realistic game, I play UrT rather than ET.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2008, 07:14:29 pm by _Equilibrium_ »
Logged

Coolicus

  • Posts: 18
  • Turrets: +2/-10
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2007, 09:15:25 pm »
If it was a long time ago, it might have been Return to castle wolfenstein, ET. ;D
Logged
-OMG ADMIN BAN T3H ALIENS THEY DEC0NNED R ARM LULZ!-Human ST1 on alien rush

mooseberry

  • Community Moderators
  • *
  • Posts: 4005
  • Turrets: +666/-325
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2008, 07:09:44 am »
I have ET:quake wars, and I haven't played it much long story short was lost for a while, but I  think it has very fun multiplayer and is definetly worth playing.
Logged
Bucket: [You hear the distant howl of a coyote losing at Counterstrike.]

मैं हिन्दी का समर्थन

~Mooseberry.

Odin

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 1767
  • Turrets: +113/-204
    • My Website
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2008, 05:10:11 am »
I have the game and currently play it off and on with Tremulous.

I'm }MG{Megatog615.
Logged

NiTRoX

  • Posts: 1453
  • Turrets: +41/-200
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2008, 08:41:54 am »
Is this game pay-to-play per month?
Logged

gareth

  • Posts: 710
  • Turrets: +38/-89
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2008, 10:38:30 am »
Quote from: NiTRoX on January 03, 2008, 08:41:54 am
Is this game pay-to-play per month?

a pay to play fps? :P (no).

i have it too, its ok:

http://stats.enemyterritory.com/profile/creyesis

stats are from ranked servers only, which owners have to rent from specified gsps.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2008, 10:43:33 am by gareth »
Logged

==Troy==

  • Posts: 440
  • Turrets: +65/-67
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2008, 10:55:16 am »
I was a beta tester for it... and honestly, it did not impress me as much, physics and graphics performance is average (hell, HL2 runs at better fps, with much higher gfx settings and has some realistic physics in it). I have also played the release version, which was not far from the beta one.

Its a nice game to play for a week or so... but I got way too bored with it.
Logged

Survivor

  • Posts: 1660
  • Turrets: +164/-159
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2008, 11:04:01 am »
The most important question you have to ask yourself when playing games.

Is it fun?

physics and graphics, fps and realism are not guarantees for a fun game. Because by that reasoning only the newest games should be played.
Logged
I’m busy. I’ll ignore you later.

+ OPTIMUS +

  • Posts: 1098
  • Turrets: +263/-164
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2008, 12:58:28 pm »

I tried the demo, it was funny to build and use the vehicles.

But after tremulous, the variation batween the two races is too small.

Also i don't like to get killed while i dont see my killer, e.g. in an airstike or getting sniped from a kilometer.

I guess i can't be addicted to any other fps anymore, what is a +1 for my real life :-)
Logged
success is the ability to go from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm

+PICS+

Kaleo

  • Posts: 2098
  • Turrets: +176/-220
    • KaleoDesign
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #11 on: January 04, 2008, 11:18:14 am »
Quote from: ==Troy== on January 03, 2008, 10:55:16 am
hell, HL2 runs at better fps, with much higher gfx settings and has some realistic physics in it

HL2, good physics?

Hahahaha... Your funny ;)
Logged
Quote from: Stannum
Thou canst not kill that which doth not live,
but you can blow it into chunky kibbles!
I has a cookie, and u can has a cookie, but i no givs u mai cookie...

==Troy==

  • Posts: 440
  • Turrets: +65/-67
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #12 on: January 04, 2008, 12:13:32 pm »
I will have to correct myself :

HL2 has a better physics than ETQW. Since ETQW doesnt have physics pretty much at all (and it is not really applied).
Logged

Bajsefar

  • Posts: 597
  • Turrets: +49/-39
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #13 on: January 04, 2008, 07:28:35 pm »
I think ETQW lacks the physics to minimize lag in huge online games.
Or am i wrong?

Been playing ETQW the last couple of days, now that i have a computer that can run it...
I'm pretty green though---> got laughed at today for sucking.
Logged

Survivor

  • Posts: 1660
  • Turrets: +164/-159
Re: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
« Reply #14 on: January 04, 2008, 07:52:21 pm »
Actually ETQW has some of the best antilag I've seen, you can easily play with 150 ping and be competitive as long as you don't go doing the absurd like sniping the ultralong distances or backstabbing in a full base.
Logged
I’m busy. I’ll ignore you later.
Pages: [1]   Go Up