Author Topic: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division  (Read 21709 times)

Lakitu7

  • Tremulous Developers
  • *
  • Posts: 1002
  • Turrets: +120/-73
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #30 on: January 21, 2008, 12:17:33 am »
Personally I wish I wouldn't so often see the tag in front of some name that's not on the roster. Aliasing 24/7 may have been a feature of foe, V, etc., but theoretically this is not the same.

Yarou

  • Posts: 218
  • Turrets: +43/-109
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #31 on: January 21, 2008, 12:40:41 am »
Unfortunately, certain people seem to take the liberty of using the tag, when they aren't in the clan to begin with.


Currently:
{&}Yarou

Dracone

  • Posts: 1079
  • Turrets: +138/-278
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #32 on: January 21, 2008, 12:41:30 am »
Those bastards!
Quote from: St. Anger
Tip 4 baslick guiz: Make sure you get near them bc u can stiky them i think its a bug lolz. but dont tell 2 many ppl shh.
Quote from: dobruiyyk
It's possible, your descendant will never see the sun because our species is gonna extinct in nearest future. So you better unstick from your computer and find a girl to make a child with!

IHaveWitnessed

  • Posts: 13
  • Turrets: +10/-11
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #33 on: January 21, 2008, 02:47:06 am »
Unoriginal

BeerBastard

  • Posts: 276
  • Turrets: +25/-21
    • Home of [OPP]
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #34 on: January 21, 2008, 10:35:13 am »
I know how that feels, I won't say any names though. Partially because lack of proof, and lack of really caring. It does suck when someone impersonates your clan and recruits people and you have to tell them there not really in the clan.
Feeling Oppressed?
You Down with [OPP]?


-[OPP]Beerbastard

IHaveWitnessed

  • Posts: 13
  • Turrets: +10/-11
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #35 on: January 23, 2008, 06:26:56 pm »
This is all fine and dandy, but one problem like all clans yarou has lead, this too will eventually die. Sorry Yarou  ;)

Looks like StevenM was correct.


SGA is pretty much dead (already!).

:( Poor yarou.


SOME COMPETITION THIS STARTED RIGHT??
« Last Edit: January 23, 2008, 06:29:29 pm by IHaveWitnessed »

elmo*USA

  • Guest
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #36 on: January 24, 2008, 01:36:13 am »
I know how that feels, I won't say any names though. Partially because lack of proof, and lack of really caring. It does suck when someone impersonates your clan and recruits people and you have to tell them there not really in the clan.

lol I remember that...

Pacra

  • Posts: 123
  • Turrets: +1/-1
    • http://sga.jconserv.net
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #37 on: January 29, 2008, 07:13:52 am »
3rd Coming of SGA
This proposition by Yarou would be the third rising of SGA.  Although when I look at the roster, really this looks like the next name change to SGA from what was once xil to foe to V (>).  Before I go in circles and my memory may not serve me, but Anger, Lee, Orc (I'm still extremely surprized that he would come back and have yet to see him) and maybe Lestrange (sorry man, but I don't remember if you were in SGA or not) are the ones I see from the old SGA roster and no one on that list was in XGA.  I'm wondering why you didn't bring back the GNT tag.

sounds good.

(Lakitu, do i still owe you $$$ from the last month of the server? school's eaten up all my time since this past summer.)

also, just booted XP in leopard, so gimme a shout out in IRC, i'll come play some sentimental games with you guys.
url=http://sga.jconserv.net][/url]

StevenM

  • Posts: 292
  • Turrets: +40/-33
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #38 on: January 29, 2008, 03:06:23 pm »
Nice to see you back Pac :).

BunnyTheLifeguard

  • Posts: 79
  • Turrets: +14/-15
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #39 on: January 29, 2008, 06:32:34 pm »
w000t Pacra is Alive :D

_Equilibrium_

  • Posts: 1845
  • Turrets: +96/-89
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #40 on: January 29, 2008, 06:35:27 pm »
<3 Pacra

Death On Ice

  • Posts: 1287
  • Turrets: +126/-141
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #41 on: January 30, 2008, 02:59:57 am »
Pacra has a Macra?

StevenM

  • Posts: 292
  • Turrets: +40/-33
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #42 on: January 30, 2008, 08:05:51 am »
Yeah mang Pac is all about the mac actually lol.

Kobrakai

  • Posts: 107
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #43 on: February 02, 2008, 08:37:37 am »
Yeah mang Pac is all about the mac actually lol.

He pretty much sleeps with the damn thing he loves it so much. What a nerd/jerk.

Also, this truly isn't a thread about SGA unless Tremma comes back and makes fun of us all in some snarky manner.
url=http://sga.jconserv.net][/url]

StevenM

  • Posts: 292
  • Turrets: +40/-33
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #44 on: February 02, 2008, 09:16:11 pm »
KOBRA, nice to see both of you guys are still alive :P.

thirdstreettito

  • Posts: 753
  • Turrets: +107/-1124
    • thirdstreettito's Homepage
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #45 on: February 02, 2008, 09:25:34 pm »
It is wonderful to see SGA back in action.

Death On Ice

  • Posts: 1287
  • Turrets: +126/-141
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #46 on: February 02, 2008, 09:56:02 pm »
It's dead.

your face

  • Community Moderators
  • *
  • Posts: 3843
  • Turrets: +116/-420
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #47 on: February 02, 2008, 10:28:50 pm »
i think that was sarcasm... xD

just wait till yarou comes back and revives it again... lol
spam spam spam, waste waste waste!

thirdstreettito

  • Posts: 753
  • Turrets: +107/-1124
    • thirdstreettito's Homepage
Re: {SGA} Silica Gel Alliance - Tremulous Division
« Reply #48 on: February 03, 2008, 01:53:20 pm »
It was sarcasm. :D