Author Topic: A quik Q (Read 22807 times)

Lava Croft · « **Reply #30 on:** February 18, 2008, 11:29:54 pm »

Quote from: whitebear on February 17, 2008, 12:09:56 pm

Lava most likely found him self needing to take more responsible stance after becoming mod.
Or maybe he just found out that:
1. If he abuses his powers he becomes total ass.
2. If he tells someone to *shows rude hand sign* he would be hypocrite by not cleaning the post away from forums.

I think you have enough trouble thinking for yourself, so please do not make futile attempts at thinking for me. Thank you.

player1 · « **Reply #31 on:** February 18, 2008, 11:32:20 pm »

Quote from: + OPTIMUS + on February 18, 2008, 09:54:07 pm

EDIT: someone is continuosly smiting meh

Maybe it is the dreaded smite-bot!

Atom Eve · « **Reply #32 on:** February 19, 2008, 12:01:04 am »

I prefer to think that I'm Neutral Good, though I might just be kidding myself.

player1 · « **Reply #33 on:** February 19, 2008, 12:10:28 am »

Lawful Good   Neutral Good   Chaotic Good
Lawful Neutral   Neutral   Chaotic Neutral
Lawful Evil Neutral Evil   Chaotic Evil

techhead · « **Reply #34 on:** February 19, 2008, 02:17:06 am »

Chaotic good FTW
By the way, chaotic does not equal bad, it just means you don't like to follow the rules. Lawful alignments prefer to to stick to the rules, even bad ones.

toastisgood · « **Reply #35 on:** February 20, 2008, 03:33:45 am »

this explains caveman's -103 lol hes an a-hole

whitebear · « **Reply #36 on:** February 20, 2008, 08:51:40 am »

I'm probably in category: chaotic natural. I mean. No one wants crazy man in their party. ^^

+ OPTIMUS + · « **Reply #37 on:** February 20, 2008, 10:07:05 pm »

i wonder why i wasn't a feeder in roleplaying games. sanity roll.

Critters · « **Reply #38 on:** February 21, 2008, 03:16:14 am »

Well i think this whole Karma this doesn't work too well. Mostly the only reason i have -13 karma was becuase my post on 1.2. But even then if you look at last posts i losen up alot.

PIE · « **Reply #39 on:** February 21, 2008, 08:36:20 am »

I dropped quite a bit since that topic as well.. thanks a lot :p
I would simply like to state i played the pre 1.2 slow turrets btw so everyone stop your hating.

My karma goes up a point a day and then back down one or two. I don't even have to post anything.
The persistent win i guess. I try to stay consistent. Good posts applaud, bad(spam) smite. Not following people around because I don't like them, not applauding them because I think their karma doesn't match my opinion. Thats how its supposed to work imho.

Kaleo · « **Reply #40 on:** February 21, 2008, 08:48:55 am »

I rarely smite or applause.

+ OPTIMUS + · « **Reply #41 on:** February 21, 2008, 04:44:46 pm »

I guess instead of karma, there should be rather "attitude", you could set it per person from a default zero within maximised limits, and then change it if you change your mind about the same forumer. the average could be the objective judgement of the community towards your presence.

so smites and applaudes wouldn't be the matter of activity, but general simpathy.

whitebear · « **Reply #42 on:** February 21, 2008, 04:54:51 pm »

You mean like this?
Flamer
Helper
Spammer
Star
Funny
Not funny
etc.

player1 · « **Reply #43 on:** February 21, 2008, 06:22:37 pm »

whitebear u make me smile

Critters · « **Reply #44 on:** February 22, 2008, 12:07:02 am »

Quote from: + OPTIMUS + on February 21, 2008, 04:44:46 pm

I guess instead of karma, there should be rather "attitude", you could set it per person from a default zero within maximised limits, and then change it if you change your mind about the same forumer. the average could be the objective judgement of the community towards your presence.

so smites and applaudes wouldn't be the matter of activity, but general simpathy.

not even that...people can make it as low as they can get just for a couple of "haha" moments. I think they should just remove the whole thing ***OR*** make them make reasons for giving the - Karma **but** they have to be real reasons. Mabe there could be Karma Police(lol) to check all the reasons out and see if they are good or not.

+ OPTIMUS + · « **Reply #45 on:** February 22, 2008, 09:31:53 am »

but this way one person's activity can't affect your karma as much. but if you have low karma by the average judging of the community, well, that means to think some things twice.

Critters · « **Reply #46 on:** February 22, 2008, 11:57:40 pm »

well ever since i have been posting they dropped my Karma now to -19 don't ask me why but i gess that is who they think i am.

EDIT: no harm to Lava but i have seen him be an ass. If i some how get to -50 that mean im even with Lava with no reason. I don't get it. I really don't mean to be meen to Lava im just useing him for this EDIT

techhead · « **Reply #47 on:** February 23, 2008, 02:25:42 am »

Karma 2.0:
People can post what they think of you, from 0 to 10, and can change it at a later date.
Average score is displayed publicly on your profile.

If you want to make it even more fancy, give people with higher scores higher weight when it comes to the calculation of average scores. If you could code it without recursive problems and such, I would really be impressed.

whitebear · « **Reply #48 on:** February 23, 2008, 03:10:40 pm »

I like the idea of one vote per person that can be changed anytime. Average score from the votes. Mibie the votes of people that are inactive for month would be taken away.

+ OPTIMUS + · « **Reply #49 on:** February 25, 2008, 02:38:02 pm »

Quote from: Critters on February 22, 2008, 11:57:40 pm

well ever since i have been posting they dropped my Karma now to -19 don't ask me why but i gess that is who they think i am.

EDIT: no harm to Lava but i have seen him be an ass. If i some how get to -50 that mean im even with Lava with no reason. I don't get it. I really don't mean to be meen to Lava im just useing him for this EDIT

if you fall below -50, your are an asshole.

if lava is falling below -50, it's because he is noble and honest.

it's all about explanation.

Critters · « **Reply #50 on:** February 26, 2008, 05:44:45 am »

Now im at -22

w/e not a big deal. It is just i don't someone new to come on the forums and look at my karma and think im an ass when im not.

+ OPTIMUS + · « **Reply #51 on:** February 26, 2008, 11:56:05 am »

Critters, there are many kind of people here, different age, education, culture, etc.
For young people like you, it's hard to splash into the community as an instantly popular person.
Many of us are as old as your teachers, or maybe your parents.
Many of us are thinking that they are smarter than your teachers and parents.
And you are probably new to the community, so it's even harder.

words don't come easy ;-)

whitebear · « **Reply #52 on:** February 26, 2008, 12:06:30 pm »

If karma system had existed on these forums when I joined, it would be about -1000.
But people change (in two years). ^^

Eyn Xaeyn · « **Reply #53 on:** February 26, 2008, 10:24:50 pm »

Quote from: + OPTIMUS + on February 25, 2008, 02:38:02 pm

Quote from: Critters on February 22, 2008, 11:57:40 pm
well ever since i have been posting they dropped my Karma now to -19 don't ask me why but i gess that is who they think i am.

EDIT: no harm to Lava but i have seen him be an ass. If i some how get to -50 that mean im even with Lava with no reason. I don't get it. I really don't mean to be meen to Lava im just useing him for this EDIT

if you fall below -50, your are an asshole.

if lava is falling below -50, it's because he is noble and honest.

it's all about explanation.

HEY!!! u meany...
all i did was call caveman a single-cell ameoba, i thought ppl would applaud me for standing up to Trems critic...

Critters · « **Reply #54 on:** February 28, 2008, 12:41:37 am »

heh.

Anyway w/e not a big deal. I don;t care if im popular just as long as ot doesn't get bad enough that no one is having fun. Then it gets ugly

News:

Author Topic: A quik Q (Read 22807 times)

Lava Croft

toastisgood