Author Topic: The max FPS thread. (Read 12477 times)

Dr.Salvador · « **on:** April 26, 2009, 10:36:10 pm »

Alright guys, time for some e-peen bolstering:

System specs:
evga 790i ultra SLI
Intel Core i7 Extreme Desktop @ 3.8GHz
12gb ddr3 1600 (at 8-8-8-24)
2x Caviar Black 1TB
Turbo-Cool 1200w
2x GTX 295 (Quad SLI)
total cost: ~$4500

Annihilation · « **Reply #1 on:** April 26, 2009, 10:40:30 pm »

Good job, you can successfully make your fps so high that you can't play.

Hendrich · « **Reply #2 on:** April 26, 2009, 10:46:38 pm »

Just...just why.

mooseberry · « **Reply #3 on:** April 26, 2009, 10:47:21 pm »

I cap mine at 76.

I hope you realize that 3833 compared to 200 is the exact same to the human eye.

Bissig · « **Reply #4 on:** April 26, 2009, 11:22:58 pm »

Wasting 4500 dollars to play a quake3 game... PRICELESS!

Dr.Salvador · « **Reply #5 on:** April 26, 2009, 11:24:58 pm »

Quote from: mooseberry on April 26, 2009, 10:47:21 pm

I cap mine at 76.

I hope you realize that 3833 compared to 200 is the exact same to the human eye.

I just made this thread because people wouldn't believe me about the quad-sli 295's, and told me to post a screenshot of max fps.

cactusfrog · « **Reply #6 on:** April 27, 2009, 04:42:34 am »

its because no one would believe that you were stupid enough to soup up your pc just to have high fps in a q3 game.

mooseberry · « **Reply #7 on:** April 27, 2009, 04:43:51 am »

Quote from: cactusfrog on April 27, 2009, 04:42:34 am

soup up your bs

gimhael · « **Reply #8 on:** April 27, 2009, 06:03:59 am »

I get >500 fps on the same spot with a €20 GeForce 6600.

Overdose · « **Reply #9 on:** April 27, 2009, 08:38:35 am »

mine pic
My system specs are kind of like a third of yours so it's fitting that I get about one-third the FPS.

Evga 750i FTW
Intel C2D E8400 @ 3.6GHz
4GB DDR2 1066 @ 4-5-5-15
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB
Hiper Type-M 880w
Evga GTX 260 (just 1

)
Total cost: ~$1500 (originally; worth much less now)

(Having spent that much money on a computer I jump at the chance to "show off" my specs, so don't hate me for it.)

Asvarox · « **Reply #10 on:** April 27, 2009, 02:05:30 pm »

I have much better things to do with $4,5k than spending it for my computer...
300$PCs ftw

Quote

I get >500 fps on the same spot with a €20 GeForce 6600.

I get >200fps on the same spot with a €25 Radeon X1650 haxer

but this card sucks anyway

ATCS ISN'T WELL OPTIMIZED

Kaleo · « **Reply #11 on:** April 27, 2009, 02:08:48 pm »

If I had a $USD4500 computer, I would be playing Oblivion on full graphics ever waking moment of the day.

Doing mad assassin shit and stealing from people.

And not doing the main storyline, because it's boring.

kevlarman · « **Reply #12 on:** April 27, 2009, 06:08:22 pm »

you guys do realize that trem isn't 0ms safe (bad things happen when a frame is shorter than 1msec).

Overdose · « **Reply #13 on:** April 27, 2009, 06:50:23 pm »

Quote from: kevlarman on April 27, 2009, 06:08:22 pm

you guys do realize that trem isn't 0ms safe (bad things happen when a frame is shorter than 1msec).

How fast is that? I keep my fps capped at 125 for normal play.

Yahoo · « **Reply #14 on:** April 27, 2009, 07:00:10 pm »

@ the haters, he was telling us about his computer he built, we asked him how many FPS he could get on trem, and to post it

he said he normally caps it at 90fps

gimhael · « **Reply #15 on:** April 27, 2009, 07:10:37 pm »

Quote from: Asvarox on April 27, 2009, 02:05:30 pm

I have much better things to do with $4,5k than spending it for my computer...
300$PCs ftw

Quote
I get >500 fps on the same spot with a €20 GeForce 6600.
I get >200fps on the same spot with a €25 Radeon X1650 haxer but this card sucks anyway

ATCS ISN'T WELL OPTIMIZED

To be honest, I get only ~300 fps when I turn off all my renderer modifications, so the GeForce card isn't that much faster.

Bissig · « **Reply #16 on:** April 27, 2009, 08:44:35 pm »

Quote from: Overdose on April 27, 2009, 06:50:23 pm

Quote from: kevlarman on April 27, 2009, 06:08:22 pm
you guys do realize that trem isn't 0ms safe (bad things happen when a frame is shorter than 1msec).

How fast is that? I keep my fps capped at 125 for normal play.

1000ms/1ms(frametime)=1000 -> 1000fps -> anything higher than 1000fps.

Kaleo · « **Reply #17 on:** April 27, 2009, 11:15:26 pm »

Well, I get around 200fps in Trem, 500fps in Quake 3 and around 120fps in Urban Terror.

Archangel · « **Reply #18 on:** April 28, 2009, 05:18:14 am »

i get close on 1000 fps in most places on ATCS at 1600x1200, full AA/AF forced via env variables, shinytrem, bloom enabled. XFX 9800GTX+ here. it's the only part of my computer i paid for

rest of it I all got free from people who didn't want it, or dumpster diving.

Dr.Salvador · « **Reply #19 on:** April 28, 2009, 06:47:52 am »

Quote from: kevlarman on April 27, 2009, 06:08:22 pm

you guys do realize that trem isn't 0ms safe (bad things happen when a frame is shorter than 1msec).

What happens when a frame is shorter than 1 msec?
(I suppose less than ONE MILLISECOND in google could tell me this)

kevlarman · « **Reply #20 on:** April 28, 2009, 05:07:46 pm »

Quote from: Yahoo on April 27, 2009, 07:00:10 pm

@ the haters, he was telling us about his computer he built, we asked him how many FPS he could get on trem, and to post it

he said he normally caps it at 90fps

except that isn't trem (by that logic, i could blend textures and lightmaps in software, dump the whole thing into a vbo, and while(1){ glDrawArrays(); } and probably get 4 digits)

Thorn · « **Reply #21 on:** April 28, 2009, 05:13:20 pm »

How'd you get the counter above 1000? It always caps at 1000 here.

Overdose · « **Reply #22 on:** April 28, 2009, 07:57:04 pm »

Quote from: Thorn on April 28, 2009, 05:13:20 pm

How'd you get the counter above 1000? It always caps at 1000 here.

You're right, I just tried it again and it wouldn't break 1000. What gives?

Yahoo · « **Reply #23 on:** April 28, 2009, 09:27:59 pm »

Quote from: kevlarman on April 28, 2009, 05:07:46 pm

Quote from: Yahoo on April 27, 2009, 07:00:10 pm
@ the haters, he was telling us about his computer he built, we asked him how many FPS he could get on trem, and to post it

he said he normally caps it at 90fps
except that isn't trem (by that logic, i could blend textures and lightmaps in software, dump the whole thing into a vbo, and while(1){ glDrawArrays(); } and probably get 4 digits)

lol

The_Spy · « **Reply #24 on:** May 01, 2009, 12:57:44 am »

Jesus Christ...
Mine top at 110. On a good day. Lowest I have ever had was like -5 or something.

Asvarox · « **Reply #25 on:** May 01, 2009, 05:20:45 pm »

-5 fps? Now I know the reason of Déjà vu's

kevlarman · « **Reply #26 on:** May 02, 2009, 01:15:01 am »

i've gotten nexuiz's fps meter to show me both 2147483647 and -2147483648 by using a sufficiently slow computer.

News:

Author Topic: The max FPS thread. (Read 12477 times)

Archangel

Thorn