Author Topic: Tremulous ''last'' match!  (Read 15418 times)

Trenak

  • Posts: 19
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Tremulous ''last'' match!
« on: October 08, 2013, 07:14:24 pm »
Hello , this saturday 12.10.2013 at 16:00 i want make ''last'' tremulous match. We will play at 1.1. When you want know more come here https://www.facebook.com/groups/351845618222372/ .. Thanks.. We want many players!  :defcomp: :tyrant: We want you! Tremulous isn't Dead!
 *Link Removed*

kharnov

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 626
  • Turrets: +47/-791
    • Unvanquished
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2013, 09:42:47 pm »
So you state that Tremulous isn't dead, and yet you want to have a final match on it.

/dev/humancontroller

  • Posts: 1033
  • Turrets: +1002/-383
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2013, 08:12:36 pm »

ULTRA Random ViruS

  • Posts: 924
  • Turrets: +4/-101
    • ZdrytchX's reference website
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2013, 10:24:16 am »
12.10.2013
formatting...
He's using american standards or whatever it's called, but he means this Saturday.

/dev/humancontroller

  • Posts: 1033
  • Turrets: +1002/-383
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2013, 09:11:21 pm »
He's using american standards or whatever it's called
ah, he's probably only inviting players from his country.
the format is not American, btw.

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2013, 10:31:32 pm »
He's using american standards or whatever it's called
ah, he's probably only inviting players from his country.
the format is not American, btw.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format_by_country

and yes, dev/hc, the way he wrote it is properly formatted.  just not formatted to your expectations.  i'm sure you can see from the map, more places use his formatting than ours.

this is also not the first time i've called you on date formatting.  please learn from your mistakes in the future, i may not always be around to enlighten you.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

kharnov

  • Spam Killer
  • *
  • Posts: 626
  • Turrets: +47/-791
    • Unvanquished
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2013, 11:31:30 pm »

/dev/humancontroller

  • Posts: 1033
  • Turrets: +1002/-383
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2013, 11:02:09 am »
more places use his formatting than ours.
irrelevant. what's relevant is:
  • how well-developed a standard format is (with respect to useful properties), and
  • how many people use the format.
in both of these, YYYY-MM-DD dominates.
this is also not the first time i've called you on date formatting.
it is, however, the Nth time (out of N calls) that you're WRONG about formatting.

ULTRA Random ViruS

  • Posts: 924
  • Turrets: +4/-101
    • ZdrytchX's reference website
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2013, 12:13:58 pm »
how well-developed a standard format is (with respect to useful properties)
dafaq?
Only use I can think of is sorting out files. Indeed, YYYY-MM-DD is the most useful in this case, but is that it?

In Australia, we just say from the mose precise to the least precise details, such as "It is now 9:23, on the Thirteenth of February, 1992" while lil'mericans or whatever use "It is now 9:23 AM, February the thirteenth, 1992" but for business efficency in terms of sorting, it's just the reverse of the Australian Standards: "It is 1992, February the thirteenth, 09:23."

However, I've never seen "13.02.92" written in my country (as assumed by the wiki,) we use the latter example they provided ("13/2/92" without prefixed '0's unless entering into a database).

One annoying thing though, is that practically 99% of our computers use american standards by default (without any other options for most cases), so when viewing files by date, I'm still not used to searching for the middle column for date.

/dev/humancontroller

  • Posts: 1033
  • Turrets: +1002/-383
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2013, 03:17:36 pm »
how well-developed a standard format is (with respect to useful properties)
dafaq?
Only use I can think of is sorting out files. Indeed, YYYY-MM-DD is the most useful in this case, but is that it?
follow the link i provided.
mose precise
wtf is "mose precise"? do you mean least significant, ie., second fractions (least significant), seconds, minutes, hours, days, months, years (most significant)? in that case,
9:23
is the 10th minute of the 23rd hour?

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #10 on: October 11, 2013, 09:05:53 pm »
more places use his formatting than ours.
irrelevant. what's relevant is:
  • how well-developed a standard format is (with respect to useful properties), and
  • how many people use the format.
in both of these, YYYY-MM-DD dominates.
this is also not the first time i've called you on date formatting.
it is, however, the Nth time (out of N calls) that you're WRONG about formatting.

look at the map.  not even as many people primarily use imperial measurements as use our date formatting.  the united states does not house most people in the world.  even china's format is outnumbered.  as the facts do not support your argument, it is irrelevant.  you are wrong about the rightness of the date format you prefer.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

vcxzet

  • Posts: 467
  • Turrets: +21/-13
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #11 on: October 12, 2013, 12:06:54 am »


/dev/humancontroller

  • Posts: 1033
  • Turrets: +1002/-383
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #12 on: October 12, 2013, 02:04:10 am »
the facts do not support your argument
WRONG. there is a combination of
  • a misleading table, and
  • your misinterpretation.
you are wrong about the rightness of the date format you prefer.
WRONG.

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2013, 05:48:41 am »
the facts do not support your argument
WRONG. there is a combination of
  • a misleading table, and
  • your misinterpretation.
you are wrong about the rightness of the date format you prefer.
WRONG.


incorrect.  you can claim the facts are as wrong as you like, you will stay just as incorrect.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

ULTRA Random ViruS

  • Posts: 924
  • Turrets: +4/-101
    • ZdrytchX's reference website
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2013, 11:12:54 am »
And so another RAKninja versus /dev/hc battle begins...

Loki

  • Posts: 253
  • Turrets: +1/-53
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #15 on: October 15, 2013, 10:10:22 am »
So you state that Tremulous isn't dead, and yet you want to have a final match on it.

I wonder why the hell you even bother to come here with such stupid comment.
Every single post of me 2012 and below must be left ignored. That wasn't me. That must've been some retarded kid.

/dev/humancontroller

  • Posts: 1033
  • Turrets: +1002/-383
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #16 on: October 15, 2013, 10:37:23 am »
WRONG.
incorrect.  you can claim the facts are as wrong as you like, you will stay just as incorrect.
WRONG. the facts are -- by definition -- facts. they just do not support your statement.

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #17 on: October 15, 2013, 09:22:05 pm »

WRONG. the facts are -- by definition -- facts. they just do not support your statement.
this statement would be correct if i were stating it to you.  the fact is, most of the world, both geographically and by population, uses the month-day-year format for dates in everyday use.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

/dev/humancontroller

  • Posts: 1033
  • Turrets: +1002/-383
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #18 on: October 16, 2013, 08:08:54 pm »

WRONG. the facts are -- by definition -- facts. they just do not support your statement.
this statement would be correct if i were stating it to you.  the fact is, most of the world, both geographically and by population, uses the month-day-year format for dates in everyday use.
WRONG. "month-day-year" is not a date format, dumbass.

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #19 on: October 16, 2013, 11:04:09 pm »

WRONG. the facts are -- by definition -- facts. they just do not support your statement.
this statement would be correct if i were stating it to you.  the fact is, most of the world, both geographically and by population, uses the month-day-year format for dates in everyday use.
WRONG. "month-day-year" is not a date format, dumbass.
get vindictive when we are not correct, do we?

"month-day-year" is an example of the Date Order.

http://bit.ly/19R9Vgz

you really like to dig a hole of wrong for yourself when you are incorrect, dont you?

also, your grasp of the english language seems to be slipping.  please, fact check yourself before you make another blunder of this magnitude.
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

B-wizzle

  • Posts: 2
  • Turrets: +0/-0
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #20 on: October 17, 2013, 01:00:41 am »
He's using american standards or whatever it's called
ah, he's probably only inviting players from his country.
the format is not American, btw.
He is saying 10-12-2013. Pretty much saying it the wrong way. looks like it says december 10th. Really October 12th

RAKninja-Decepticon

  • Posts: 843
  • Turrets: +14/-679
    • Stupid Videos
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #21 on: October 17, 2013, 07:15:36 pm »
He's using american standards or whatever it's called
ah, he's probably only inviting players from his country.
the format is not American, btw.
He is saying 10-12-2013. Pretty much saying it the wrong way. looks like it says december 10th. Really October 12th
read the thread, please.  the way he wrote it is not wrong in most of the world. 
Note 4: The best, although not always easiest, way to deal with trolls is thus: do not respond at ALL in the thread.
Main Rules
4.) No spamming or advertising (includes useless multi-posts and bumps.)
6b.) Do NOT harass other members.
  6c.) Do NOT troll!

/dev/humancontroller

  • Posts: 1033
  • Turrets: +1002/-383
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #22 on: October 17, 2013, 09:49:01 pm »
"month-day-year" is an example of the Date Order.
correct. it is understood that the class of middle-endian formats (day, then month, then year; including D/M/YYYY, DD.MM.YYYY, etc.) is a lot more popular than the class of all other formats (including YYYY-MM-DD, MM/DD/YYYY, etc.). However, the most popular format is YYYY-MM-DD, followed roughly by DD/MM/YYYY.

get vindictive when we are not correct, do we?

you really like to dig a hole of wrong for yourself when you are incorrect, dont you?

also, your grasp of the english language seems to be slipping.  please, fact check yourself before you make another blunder of this magnitude.
you really like to throw random comments meaning "you're retarded" / "you fail", without pointing anything out.1

1 period

ULTRA Random ViruS

  • Posts: 924
  • Turrets: +4/-101
    • ZdrytchX's reference website
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #23 on: October 18, 2013, 10:57:43 am »
Just so you know, this topic is over. You already argued about this.

Also, this topic is over (referring to the actual topic), because the date has past. One person arrived, that's it I guess.

vcxzet

  • Posts: 467
  • Turrets: +21/-13
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #24 on: October 20, 2013, 07:56:28 pm »
Just so you know, this topic is over. You already argued about this.

Also, this topic is over (referring to the actual topic), because the date has past. One person arrived, that's it I guess.
Wrong CCC Combo Breaker format

Loki

  • Posts: 253
  • Turrets: +1/-53
Re: Tremulous ''last'' match!
« Reply #25 on: August 24, 2014, 11:21:24 pm »
test

sorry, had to try
Every single post of me 2012 and below must be left ignored. That wasn't me. That must've been some retarded kid.