Author Topic: Building on top of the armoury (Read 8207 times)

/dev/humancontroller · « **on:** July 13, 2007, 08:35:02 am »

OK, maybe hard to code.

Also, when the armoury dies, everything on it should too, so it's only for minimum-space situations.

A_Total_noob · « **Reply #1 on:** July 13, 2007, 12:26:23 pm »

I vote for dual-turret solutions.

Somethief · « **Reply #2 on:** July 13, 2007, 04:44:57 pm »

You dont need anything there, its full of camping hummies anyway :E

Mispeled · « **Reply #3 on:** July 13, 2007, 07:24:54 pm »

Spawn or 1 turret would be okay. I don't see the point of medi.

Also: you should be able to put armory on top of armory.

blood2.0 · « **Reply #4 on:** August 09, 2007, 09:41:14 pm »

that would be the moast usefull thing to build on top of an armoury

HamStar · « **Reply #5 on:** August 09, 2007, 10:27:06 pm »

Spawn-Armoury has to be the worst idea ever.

-- Buying weapon and blocking the spawn

-- Waiting to spawn someone

(waiting to spawn) -- Dude, stop spawn blocking!

-- I'm trying to buy my bloody weapon!

was kicked by

for spawnblocking.

See?

ShadowNinjaDudeMan · « **Reply #6 on:** August 09, 2007, 11:00:46 pm »

Quote from: "HamStar"

Spawn-Armoury has to be the worst idea ever.

-- Buying weapon and blocking the spawn
-- Waiting to spawn someone

(waiting to spawn) -- Dude, stop spawn blocking!
-- I'm trying to buy my bloody weapon!
was kicked by for spawnblocking.

See?

Ci.

Look, its not as if the top of the armoury is any real estate, its tiny, and would just annoy ppl who wanted to decon the [building on armoury] but instead decon the armoury, maybe losing the game.

Nux · « **Reply #7 on:** August 09, 2007, 11:32:57 pm »

I do this all the time.

Overdose · « **Reply #8 on:** August 10, 2007, 01:06:29 am »

Turret on top of the armoury would be ok, but I would rather have a turret on top of the reactor.

@Nux - How'd you do that?

n00b pl0x · « **Reply #9 on:** August 10, 2007, 02:20:05 am »

Undeference · « **Reply #10 on:** August 10, 2007, 03:12:15 am »

I don't see the "Armoury" or "Reactor" options.

Overdose · « **Reply #11 on:** August 10, 2007, 04:15:01 am »

Quote from: "Undeference"

I don't see the "Armoury" or "Reactor" options.

Thats because there are none.

Nux · « **Reply #12 on:** August 10, 2007, 03:09:57 pm »

Quote from: "YourMama"

Turret on top of the armoury would be ok, but I would rather have a turret on top of the reactor.

@Nux - How'd you do that?

I don't want to tell you ^^ I want you to figure it out.

All I'll say is that it was done in-game with no cheats.

Vector_Matt · « **Reply #13 on:** August 10, 2007, 04:33:59 pm »

Quote from: "Nux"

I don't want to tell you ^^ I want you to figure it out.

Done.

Paradox · « **Reply #14 on:** August 10, 2007, 04:41:33 pm »

Yea transit box building is an old hat.

Nux · « **Reply #15 on:** August 10, 2007, 11:56:48 pm »

I wanted him to figure it out himself >8( It wasn't a contest xD

Overdose · « **Reply #16 on:** August 11, 2007, 12:04:53 am »

lol, I would have gotten it soon anyway.
I read ben's post about you in his challenge thread, and I lol'd when I read "granger towers."

Nux · « **Reply #17 on:** August 11, 2007, 12:07:32 am »

I is very sneaky

Now back on topic

Vector_Matt · « **Reply #18 on:** August 11, 2007, 12:20:17 am »

Quote from: "Nux"

I wanted him to figure it out himself >8( It wasn't a contest xD

Oh, sorry. I thought you meant "you" plural, not "you" singular.

Nux · « **Reply #19 on:** August 11, 2007, 01:20:46 pm »

Quote from: "Vector_Matt"

Quote from: "Nux"
I wanted him to figure it out himself >8( It wasn't a contest xD
Oh, sorry. I thought you meant "you" plural, not "you" singular.

np ^^

News:

Poll

What buildings should be allowed on the armoury?

Author Topic: Building on top of the armoury (Read 8207 times)

blood2.0