According to the official rules, admins (and really everyone should, but admins are specifically told to) are supposed to autorecord demos. Perhaps moose and/or nightstrike has one lying around as well?
Personally though I am...skeptical...of your account of things. You say that he accused you of bleeding and that you were not? Not intentionally perhaps... And quite frankly, you're reaction really doesn't fill me with confidence. Please explain the entire story, there's something you're missing here.
Let me begin:
All of the abuse you mentioned comes from moose, who is not an admin as evidenced by the fact that in your very own screenshot you called a kick vote on him, which is not possible for admin levels greater than 1. Actually I couldn't find even a level 1 entry for him. The mute from Abe can be justified from your screen shot, both of your kickvotes had no reason (I'm assuming the cancelvote at the top of that screenshot is your vote here, considering that both of moose's kickvotes are documented). Finally, moose does give a reason for two of his three kickvotes even by your own account: "aggressive behavior" and "bleed/attempted tk". You don't seem to do as much for your retribution kickvote. Furthermore, oddly enough, your being tked happens after both of these. While I don't condone (and often kick for) retribution/self defense tks (what I am beginning to assume was the nature of moose's tks), I think you're beginning to go off the deep end here. I challenge you to show me admin abuse here, for you have none documented.
So please, more details. Oh, and especially what do you mean by "can't take it?".
EDIT: a fifth re-read makes me realize you only called one kickvote in your screenshots, as two of them overlap. That makes things look a little bit better for you, although I now don't understand what moose means by "five votes". If you're vote was a revote or retaliatory I still do not see abuse in this.
Furthermore I fail to see how this is a problem for nightstrike however, considering he only has one line of text in the entire thing, and his question (albeit somewhat insulting, and if you want to be Pharisaically technical I guess you could construe that to be a racial slur) is a perfectly valid one. Similarly, while outflanked's conduct wasn't particularly flattering of himself, I fail to see how calling someone a moron and an idiot is against server rules. Certainly no score shall be awarded for perfect conduct, but not damning by any stretch of the imagination.
