Notice: Aimbotters can have guids now

[Lakitu7]

A new version of everyone's favorite aimbot has been released to work with tjw's backport client. Be advised when looking for and banning aimbotters that you can no longer use the GUID = Not Botting maxim.

It was posted 5 days ago, so it's popping up in the wild already. Oh boy!  :roll:

[Lakitu7]

Thought I'd share this part I found too because it's funny. Look at the thanks part.

[tuple]

I have a recommendation for all you server operators/admins.

Do not allow lvl 0 players to !listplayers
That way they cannot see who is an admin.  It's easier to join and BAN! if you spec someone aimbotting, cause they won't know who's who.

Also, scan your games.log for the url that all operators know all too well and create bans based on that.  I've been upgrading all aimbot bans to subnet bans (after checking that noone else is coming from that subnet )  Only Class C so far >:]

edit: an immediate and permanent subnet ban will give pause to anyone who actually likes your server.  Additionally, the more servers that do a subnet ban, the more aimbots will have to think about their dwindling choices for servers.

[tehOen]

funlily is an idiot. he doesn't even know how to code a single bit of code. just using ogc. he doesn't even credit the original author. he thinks he is cool because of the cheater idiots surrounding him and begging for aimbots and other cheats. but I know who he is. he is another cheater idiot who cant code takes others code but doesn't credit em.

but I also blame mods who didn't ban him or request ban at first sight. lol and he was talking about protection methods after he proved that he knew nothing about how the engine works.

I am not against any cheat it could be fun but I am against recursion. This aimbot is not something intelligent it is pure copy-paste-adapt. lame...

[_Equilibrium_]

rofl, secunder thanks the guy for the post. xD

[Nux]

I am not against any cheat it could be fun but I am against recursion..

This statement is recursive. In other words, "This statement is recursive" is recursive. Put another way, ""This statement is recursive" is recursive" is recursive.

I'm not sure you mean recursion. Recursion is defining something in terms of itself. Iteration is closer to your intended meaning. Plagiarism is even more suited.

[tehOen]

I'm not sure you mean recursion. Recursion is defining something in terms of itself.

you didnt get it. recursion is the right word

[Nux]

So how exactly is Null(ify) defining his aimbot in terms of itself?

[tehOen]

So how exactly is Null(ify) defining his aimbot in terms of itself?

... he is recursing ogc

[Nux]

You mean to say "he is copying ogc".

Please just use a dictionary if you don't trust my original post on the definition of recursion.

[tehOen]

You mean to say "he is copying ogc".

Please just use a dictionary if you don't trust my original post on the definition of recursion.

QUIT FUCKING AROUND
edit:
recursion - (mathematics) an expression such that each term is generated by repeating a particular mathematical operation
he is repeating exactly what ogc did
if you dont know what you are talking about , please dont open your mouth

[David]

No, you dont know what your on about.

Recursion in this situation would be if his code was a copy of his code.
But even thats not quite it.

As your quote shows, recursion is mainly used in maths, and sometimes programming.  its best left there.

[tehOen]

noobs ...
recursion doesnt have anything to do with the owner it maybe his or not
he is completely repeating the pattern of ogc For all of his aimbots

but that wasnt my point, moreover that has nothing to do with the topic
it is Nux trying to get the topic out of its scope

nux sux

[TinMan]

You mean to say "he is copying ogc".

Please just use a dictionary if you don't trust my original post on the definition of recursion.

ogc is usually a hook, is null a hook?

[Nux]

I'm afraid neither of you understand what recursion is.

recursion - (mathematics) an expression such that each term is generated by repeating a particular mathematical operation

This does not mean what you think it means. It is refering to the following:

Xn+1 = 2Xn + 1

X0 = 1

X1 = 2(1) + 1 = 3

X2 = 2(X1) + 1 = 2(3) + 1 = 7

X3 = 2(X2) + 1 = 2(7) + 1 = 15

...

X7 = 2(2(2(2(2(2(2(1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1

When it says 'repeating a particular mathematical operation' it means that each time you apply the operation, you take the result and apply that to the operation again.

This is just recursion in a mathematical setting. In general, recursion is about the larger structure being made of smaller versions of itself. This is VERY different to mere repetition.

As an Englishman and a mathematician, I'd like to think I know what I'm talking about.

As for going off-topic, I'm sorry it took so long to get the point across. I thought my original post was enough to highlight the mistake and move on.

[tehOen]

I'm afraid neither of you understand what recursion is.

recursion - (mathematics) an expression such that each term is generated by repeating a particular mathematical operation

This does not mean what you think it means. It is refering to the following:

Xn+1 = 2Xn + 1

X0 = 1

X1 = 2(1) + 1 = 3

X2 = 2(X1) + 1 = 2(3) + 1 = 7

X3 = 2(X2) + 1 = 2(7) + 1 = 15

...

X7 = 2(2(2(2(2(2(2(1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1

When it says 'repeating a particular mathematical operation' it means that each time you apply the operation, you take the result and apply that to the operation again.

This is just recursion in a mathematical setting. In general, recursion is about the larger structure being made of smaller versions of itself. This is VERY different to mere repetition.

As an Englishman and a mathematician, I'd like to think I know what I'm talking about.

As for going off-topic, I'm sorry it took so long to get the point across. I thought my original post was enough to highlight the mistake and move on.

should I point your mistakes in every post you made? if you get what I meant just move on. no need to fix it. otherwise every single topic goes off topic

[Nux]

should I point your mistakes in every post you made? if you get what I meant just move on. no need to fix it. otherwise every single topic goes off topic

Please do. I'd be glad to know where I went wrong so I can learn from it.

As I said, I never intended for the comment to go further than my original post. It was your response that took it further than this.

Back on topic: What's this about Secunder? I don't understand. :F

[tehOen]

Back on topic: What's this about Secunder? I don't understand. :F

see once again you lost in the details
look at the picture more carefully

[Nux]

I've no trouble seeing his name in the picture. That's not my problem. I've no idea who the guy is.

Have you got some kind of grudge against me now? =/

..and btw, you've quoted yourself saying something I said.

[kevlarman]

I have a recommendation for all you server operators/admins.

Do not allow lvl 0 players to !listplayers
That way they cannot see who is an admin.  It's easier to join and BAN! if you spec someone aimbotting, cause they won't know who's who.

Also, scan your games.log for the url that all operators know all too well and create bans based on that.  I've been upgrading all aimbot bans to subnet bans (after checking that noone else is coming from that subnet )  Only Class C so far >:]

edit: an immediate and permanent subnet ban will give pause to anyone who actually likes your server.  Additionally, the more servers that do a subnet ban, the more aimbots will have to think about their dwindling choices for servers.

not giving access to !listplayers is a very bad idea, if you want your admins hidden give them @

[David]

but then other admins cant see either.
and people might take offence at what he named level 0...

[tehOen]

I've no trouble seeing his name in the picture. That's not my problem. I've no idea who the guy is.

Have you got some kind of grudge against me now? =/

..and btw, you've quoted yourself saying something I said.

onoz

[tehOen]

I am not against any cheat it could be fun but I am against recursion.

that is to say repeating itself and not creating anything new
nux...
are you happy now?

[kevlarman]

I am not against any cheat it could be fun but I am against recursion.

that is to say repeating itself and not creating anything new
nux...
are you happy now?

says the guy who copy+pasted lua from xreal.

[tehOen]

you can see the difference if you look at the xreal implementation and mine

since I cant use it at "game" I used it in "server" and made several traps to it
so it is not all copy paste
plus some parts of the xreal implementation is from programming in lua

but that is not the case in funlily it is a direct copy paste of ogc and tremulous code.

kevlerman nice try though ... you failed
moreover you quoted the wrong comment XD

[Coca-Cola]

rofl, secunder thanks the guy for the post. xD

No, I thanked the guy in that thread that made me laugh...
Tell me your not that dumb?

[tehOen]

rofl, secunder thanks the guy for the post. xD

No, I thanked the guy in that thread that made me laugh...
Tell me your not that dumb?

sure thing Happy Aimbotting

[KamikOzzy]

I'm afraid neither of you understand what recursion is.

recursion - (mathematics) an expression such that each term is generated by repeating a particular mathematical operation

This does not mean what you think it means. It is refering to the following:

Xn+1 = 2Xn + 1

X0 = 1

X1 = 2(1) + 1 = 3

X2 = 2(X1) + 1 = 2(3) + 1 = 7

X3 = 2(X2) + 1 = 2(7) + 1 = 15

...

X7 = 2(2(2(2(2(2(2(1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1

When it says 'repeating a particular mathematical operation' it means that each time you apply the operation, you take the result and apply that to the operation again.

This is just recursion in a mathematical setting. In general, recursion is about the larger structure being made of smaller versions of itself. This is VERY different to mere repetition.

As an Englishman and a mathematician, I'd like to think I know what I'm talking about.

As for going off-topic, I'm sorry it took so long to get the point across. I thought my original post was enough to highlight the mistake and move on.

God damnit, that's the next chapter in my algebra book....this topic should be marked as containing "spoilers."

*cough*nerds*cough*

[Eeeew Spiders]

In general, recursion is about the larger structure being made of smaller versions of itself.

No, those are fractals Well, actually, fractals and recursion are very close related, so 1/2 of 1 for Nux
Recursion is the method, fractal the result. So
f(Xn+1) = 2f(Xn) + 1
is a recursive definition. A recursive definition is a function that uses itself in its definition list. Your quote implies that it is endless, which is a fractal.
Then there are also sequences, which your example resembles. But then again, its late so I need to sleep a bit, and tomorrow I will read up if it made any sense what I wrote

I am not against any cheat it could be fun but I am against recursion.

Code: [Select]


/*
 *  Copyrigth funlily
 */
int killCount(Player *me)
{
  if (me->aimbotActive == true && me->bitingDust == false)
  {
      Player *target = NULL;
      while((target = me->crossHairTarget()) == NULL)
          me->moveOn();      
      target->dieAlready();
      /* Call ogc aimbot code (Copyleft OGC)                            */
      /* Comment by funlily: I think this does all the smart stuff */
      return 1 + killCount(me);
  }
  else
  {
     me->say("Damn lag!!!! Cheaters!");
     return 0;
  }
}


[Ivancool]

mmm... Evlesoa=Evelsoa?

Do we have a cheater in the forum?  :O